(no title)
throwaway210222 | 4 years ago
a) because we don't have a spare planet, and
b) we kind of like our children.
Like Russian roulette, its the risk of being wrong that changes the decision making paradigm from the one you use for 'should I buy bitcoin'.
nostrebored|4 years ago
[deleted]
throwaway210222|4 years ago
Care to share which of the thousands of peer-reviewed papers on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's website, you have:
a) read
b) understood
c) found errors in
d) brought to the world's attention?
500, 10, 1, ? I thought not.
And yes, of course it sucks - no one wants this. You seem to think the unpleasantness of the diagnosis and remedy gives you and yours an out.
https://www.ipcc.ch/
1_player|4 years ago
It is, and it's our only option. It's the reason nobody is doing a lot to combat climate change: because it'll require a lot of tears, effort and money, and nobody wants or can afford to spend them.
At the end, it's always the poor that have to pay. It's always been like that. Doesn't make climate change any less real.
UncleMeat|4 years ago
But the wealthy people who make this argument tend to argue for total inaction rather than a justice-focused approach where they sacrifice greatly in order to permit the global poor to have access to efficient energy for as long as possible.
rand49an|4 years ago
throwaway894345|4 years ago