top | item 29185063

(no title)

HNo | 4 years ago

He was not an active shooter, he was a victim fleeing, so, no.

discuss

order

ceejayoz|4 years ago

He had just shot two people, was still armed, and proceeded to shoot a third shortly after.

That fits every definition of “active shooter” I’ve ever seen.

hunterb123|4 years ago

Again, those two people attacked him.

HNo|4 years ago

>He had just shot two people

He had just defended himself against two assailants.

>was still armed

But not threatening or brandishing.

>and proceeded to shoot a third shortly after.

And proceeded to defend himself against a third assailant.

>That fits every definition of “active shooter” I’ve ever seen.

Fits practically no definition of "active shooter".