top | item 2924513

Steve Wozniak Comments On Jobs Resignation Announcement

106 points| matthewphiong | 14 years ago |cultofmac.com | reply

31 comments

order
[+] ctdonath|14 years ago|reply
Wozniak: "Steve needs now to just have some 'Steve time'. He deserves it."

I worry about this. Brilliant minds wholly obsessed with their work often do not take retirement well, or long. As in:

- A week before "Eyes Wide Shut" completed post-production, Stanley Kubric died.

- A week after ending 50 years of "Peanuts", Charles Schultz died.

Other examples exist.

Better indeed he remain on the BoD of Apple in a controlling role, and/or have some other deep involvement suitable for his health. Berkley Breathed has ended Opus' forum (under whatever name) at least four times; restarting has been good for him. May jobs continue to live and breathe Apple for a long time to come, as it is his air.

[+] bh42222|14 years ago|reply
Brilliant minds wholly obsessed with their work often do not take retirement well, or long.

Or more probably, brilliant minds wholly obsessed with their work only retire when their health forces them to. This most often means the end is near.

I am not saddened by Steve resigning the CEO role at Apple. I am saddened by what I fear the reason for his resignation is.

[+] gnufied|14 years ago|reply
There are countless counter examples for this. Steve like everyone else may die (he just got operated twice for critical illness!), but I think you are reading too much in those examples.

Steve, does deserve "Steve time". I like how graceful Wozniak is, in his response.

[+] scott_s|14 years ago|reply
The other way to look at it is these people continued working as long as humanly possible. They quit not because they wanted to move on, but because they couldn't continue.
[+] eavc|14 years ago|reply
You might be confusing cause with effect. Charles Schultz may well have lost something essential which caused him to quit the strip and subsequently die.
[+] jamesrom|14 years ago|reply
I'd like to see a case where someone didn't stop what they were doing after they died.
[+] philwelch|14 years ago|reply
In Kubrick's case, he took over a decade off before making Eyes Wide Shut and would undoubtedly had wanted to make some final edits after post-production or even after release, as was his habit. I don't think he intended to retire.
[+] sp332|14 years ago|reply
My uncle had a heart attack 2 weeks after retiring. my family explained it as, "Some people just can't handle retirement" :) He's OK now. One actual explanation I've heard is that the stress can keep your body from healing properly. So as soon as the stress stops holding you together, everything just falls apart.
[+] daemin|14 years ago|reply
I can't remember from what article this was, might have even been from a book, but I read that in the chinese (probably) community there was an important festival for which the oldest woman of the family played an important role. The researchers found that for some weeks before the festival the death rate was significantly decreased, and for the same period after it was significantly increased. Meaning that people hang on for important events.

With respect to this the good news is that Steve Jobs is still the Chairman of Apple, and thus would still have significant input if he so chooses.

[+] yuhong|14 years ago|reply
Well, Steve Jobs is remaining on the BoD as chairman.
[+] drcube|14 years ago|reply
Every time I see an old picture of the Steves, Woz looks like a hacker and Jobs looks like a rock star.
[+] jonursenbach|14 years ago|reply
That's a fairly accurate representation of the two.
[+] maxharris|14 years ago|reply
According to thenextweb.tumblr.com, Wozniak also said this during the interview:

"Steve was very fast thinking and wanted to do things, I wanted to build things. I think Atlas Shrugged was one of his guides in life."

My own personal experience is that there are some very powerful ideas in that book. It's gratifying to see that great people like Woz and Jobs also think so.

Edit: Why is this being downvoted? It is an actual quote from the interview with Woz, with attribution. It's on-topic, and it helps complete the picture of what he actually said. How is that a bad thing? Why bowdlerize Woz?

[+] CamperBob|14 years ago|reply
I didn't initially have much respect for Rand or Atlas Shrugged, having read her years ago and concluded that her ideas didn't account for human nature any better than Communism did... but I have to admit, her stock rises in my sight every time someone feels compelled to mod down a post that so much as mentions the unholy words on Reddit or HN.

Someone who pisses off that many hipsters must have done something right. No one has ever received so much revulsion from the so-called intellectual elite without advocating genocide or other atrocities... and perhaps even then. Dangerous ideas are interesting.

[+] zachcb|14 years ago|reply
I was surprised when Woz said on Bloomberg TV that him and Steve aren't as close as they used to be. He said that he's been finding out this news by reading like everyone else has. That's kind of sad to me. I would of thought they'd still be close friends.
[+] philwelch|14 years ago|reply
It's rare to keep a close friend for 30-40 years. Especially when you end up in totally different places in life.
[+] 5hoom|14 years ago|reply
“You’ve got to remember. He was surrounded by great, great people at Apple… and those people are still there."

Sounds like Steve's team gets a tick of approval from the Woz, that bodes well for the future of the company.