(no title)
Grimm1
|
4 years ago
Unfortunately language isn't a static thing and is somewhat defined by the dominant usage of something over time (unless you're in the rare country that has fully prescriptive language). I had been using crypto as shorthand for cryptography for a long time but cryptocurrency quickly subsumed that. If I talk to any of my non technical friends, and even technical friends who don't touch cryptography, crypto = cryptocurrency. I think the war is lost here.
giantrobot|4 years ago
While most people aren't talking to their non-technical friends and family about cryptography too often, the co-opting of "crypto" is problematic for companies. They now have to explain to lay people why a new phone isn't pumping out Bitcoin when it was advertised as having strong cryptography. It's going to also be super problematic when politicians start talking about "crypto" regulation and we're having to fight battles over the legality of cryptography again. I don't think my old RSA-as-one-liner still fits.
AnthonyMouse|4 years ago
The cynic in me says they did it on purpose, because it's widely agreed by non-morons that cryptography is good and important and people wanted to associate their controversial shitcoins with that good and important thing.
Grimm1|4 years ago
blueflow|4 years ago
all nonsense ... People generally aren't good with subtle differences, i guess. I've given up explaining it to people.
JohnFen|4 years ago
The question then becomes -- since "crypto" no longer means "cryptography" -- what new shorthand term do we use?
throwvirtever|4 years ago
rsj_hn|4 years ago
snak|4 years ago
kube-system|4 years ago
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]
redwood|4 years ago
jjice|4 years ago