[tuoret]

Ironically it's the kind of terrible modern UX design that would make me want to use classic Winamp in the first place (if foobar2000 wasn't a thing).

[1_player]

Whoever is Winamp today, what they want to revive is not their old cool audio player, but just ride on the name and sell some modern piece of crap that has nothing to do with classic Winamp.

[SketchySeaBeast]

I imagine that in the age of streaming music it would be a hard sell to produce a new offline music player.

[that_guy_iain]

Let's be serious, you're not the target market. Anyone who is using minimalist software is not the target market for any corporate software. The fact it would drive you away is a feature and not bug.

[lmm]

Pretty pointless to call it "winamp" if they're not targeting that kind of user.

[hermitdev]

...and the target audience has probably never even used or heard of Winamp, so if they're trying to ride on the name with that audience, it's going to be another fail.