So what I learned was that Sarah is not a team player. Maybe not by choice, but there it is.
She also doesn't think her resume/CV/whatever that is should actually talk about her qualifications, or at least show them off.
She claims to be extremely passionate, and yet hasn't tried to show any of her portfolio.
She thinks she's smarter than almost everyone she's met.
And she's only willing to look for jobs in a small area.
The bottom line is the team player bit, though. You can't ask to join a team after saying you aren't a team player. That you're non-traditional. After you buck the entire system and then fail to sell yourself.
Sorry Sarah, but if I were in a position to hire you (I'm not, mainly because of the location specified) then I wouldn't take the chance on you. You show a lot of promise for disruption, and not a lot of promise for productivity.
How did you get "not a team player"? I read it that she was fed up of being the only "dev" person, and wants to join a team of dev's. Not having being part of a team is not the same as not being a team player in my book.
She says she's the smartest engineer she's worked with. Not at all "smarter than everyone she's met". I took that, from the rest of the text, to be saying that she hasn't worked much with other passionate and experienced engineers/devs and wants the chance to. I don't see it as a negative.
She knows she likes the Boston area, and doesn't want to move. It limits her options, but otherwise I don't see how that's negative?
If I was in a position to hire people and in the Boston area I'd definitely invite her to the office for a coffee and a chat (read: informal interview) as she's precisely the sort of person I'd want to work with. I wish her luck finding the right company.
She seems like someone who gets stuff done without making a fuss. In Belbin's Team Inventory, she'd be either be a Teamworker or a Specialist.
A group of people who are all self-promoters smoothing each other's feathers is not a team.
I'm guessing she's self-taught, with no qualifications to show. Hopefully, she can give some overview of what she's been doing in the last 10 years, though. Maybe she doesn't want to share it on a public CV? I'm guessing she's only worked for small companies / non-IT companies, thus her quip about not having smarter engineers around.
Anyway, she seems like a team player, but not much of a career-builder.
My main issue - she says "The traditional job search method seems to penalize me because I'm not very traditional." Why? No degree? No connections (um, just cold call people - you don't need connections to google nearby companies, and track down a project manager)? She gets nervous at technical interviews? Or is she just an emo kid who thinks she's somehow different?
> She thinks she's smarter than almost everyone she's met.
I understand the trepidation about that one, I really do, but yet I can almost understand. I'd like to think that I have some programming chops, but I have no deliusions that I'm an elite developer. Yet, if we take that statement to be limited to the context of a workforce, I can largely relate. Outside of a scant few people I've had the privilege of working with I haven't really been the recippient of much knowledge. I don't take this as a compliment to my self so much as a commentary on the relative lack of knowledge in the majority of large IT organizations.
That being said, it's incumbent on her to expose herself to the elites. I've met many in the meetup scene and have benefitted greatly from their expertise.
I think she's done a great thing and gotten some discussion going and some name recognition.
Maybe she's not 'presentable' to a traditional recruiter (piercings, whatever). Maybe she's self-taught (is that really a big deal now?) Maybe she has children in Boston (I have friends who would LOVE to move but family keeps you in one place).
She's probably been working solo or in small teams where she's not exposed to team engineering. It sounds to me as if she's really keen to try this and will give everthing she's got to whoever takes a chance and interviews her.
Sir wccrawford, Thanks for proving your almightyness in a very humble way by picking on a girl who tried to distinguish herself from the hordes. Unbelievable grace Sir. The world needs more people like you.
I don't see a reference to relevant experience, an indication of what kind of job you want, links to projects, or anything that could show a potential employer what you can do. I'm all for defying tradition, but you need to at least be aware of why the tradition exists.
All I see on the root of the domain is a test page for something called OpenPanel. That looks interesting. I passed it along to my web host.
Clearly she's a minimalist front-end developer lol
I just don't know why an employer looking for a good front end dev would hire someone based on this, It does not prove any skill and mostly talks about how great she thinks she is, I am confused as to why this is even on the front page?
Reduce your LinkedIn page to a plain-text with no links to a portfolio/recommendations/concrete work experience (10+ yrs of * doesn't cut it) and ask to start working without an interview and voila, it's 'non-traditional.'
As a fellow hacker who has trouble being verbally eloquent during interviews with technical details, I must say: get over it. Interviewing is a skill, and you have to actually prepare, rehearse your responses and talking points, and develop an ability to talk at length about your technology of choice. It's not an inherited trait.
I considered making one, but in the end, I decided my work history and GitHub account were much better than anything I could make up just for job hunting.
As she said, she has a portfolio. I think her goal here was to try to get interest from people based off of more than just her portfolio, rather what she wants and needs in her next opportunity. Perhaps she feels that the wrong opportunities may have come from posting a portfolio. Perhaps she feels the best opportunity will be from someone who simply gets where she is coming from. Some of the best working relationships come primarily from a personality click, the work in some cases can be secondary consideration once you know the passion is there.
When I first read Sarah's post, I was intrigued by the proposal that she is willing to just come in and start working so somebody could get to know her skills and personality in a real work environment.
However, bringing on a new person, even in that kind of role, consumes resources from the entire team as we get her up to speed. How long does it take to evaluate somebody like that? A few days? A week? I would pay her for her time though.
But why bring in Sarah? Why not somebody else who I have more information about? We often bring on contractors and sometimes end up hiring them. That is essentially a get-to-know-you-first relationship too.
So it would help to see some kind of work history, even if it is non-traditional. When hiring I look as much for self-direction as experience.
The good thing for Sarah and this approach is that she has been noticed, and we are talking about her. If she was located nearby I would just email her and ask for more details.
I think that this Job Search Experiment shows what kind of person Sarah is, and that is of great spirit and definitely great humor.
Must be quite fun to work with Sarah.
In the opposite side, wccrawford way of approaching the problem is somehow steroitipical of what a boring job offer to work with boring people can be.
[+] [-] wccrawford|14 years ago|reply
She also doesn't think her resume/CV/whatever that is should actually talk about her qualifications, or at least show them off.
She claims to be extremely passionate, and yet hasn't tried to show any of her portfolio.
She thinks she's smarter than almost everyone she's met.
And she's only willing to look for jobs in a small area.
The bottom line is the team player bit, though. You can't ask to join a team after saying you aren't a team player. That you're non-traditional. After you buck the entire system and then fail to sell yourself.
Sorry Sarah, but if I were in a position to hire you (I'm not, mainly because of the location specified) then I wouldn't take the chance on you. You show a lot of promise for disruption, and not a lot of promise for productivity.
[+] [-] robgough|14 years ago|reply
She says she's the smartest engineer she's worked with. Not at all "smarter than everyone she's met". I took that, from the rest of the text, to be saying that she hasn't worked much with other passionate and experienced engineers/devs and wants the chance to. I don't see it as a negative.
She knows she likes the Boston area, and doesn't want to move. It limits her options, but otherwise I don't see how that's negative?
If I was in a position to hire people and in the Boston area I'd definitely invite her to the office for a coffee and a chat (read: informal interview) as she's precisely the sort of person I'd want to work with. I wish her luck finding the right company.
[+] [-] wisty|14 years ago|reply
She seems like someone who gets stuff done without making a fuss. In Belbin's Team Inventory, she'd be either be a Teamworker or a Specialist.
A group of people who are all self-promoters smoothing each other's feathers is not a team.
I'm guessing she's self-taught, with no qualifications to show. Hopefully, she can give some overview of what she's been doing in the last 10 years, though. Maybe she doesn't want to share it on a public CV? I'm guessing she's only worked for small companies / non-IT companies, thus her quip about not having smarter engineers around.
Anyway, she seems like a team player, but not much of a career-builder.
My main issue - she says "The traditional job search method seems to penalize me because I'm not very traditional." Why? No degree? No connections (um, just cold call people - you don't need connections to google nearby companies, and track down a project manager)? She gets nervous at technical interviews? Or is she just an emo kid who thinks she's somehow different?
[+] [-] yock|14 years ago|reply
I understand the trepidation about that one, I really do, but yet I can almost understand. I'd like to think that I have some programming chops, but I have no deliusions that I'm an elite developer. Yet, if we take that statement to be limited to the context of a workforce, I can largely relate. Outside of a scant few people I've had the privilege of working with I haven't really been the recippient of much knowledge. I don't take this as a compliment to my self so much as a commentary on the relative lack of knowledge in the majority of large IT organizations.
That being said, it's incumbent on her to expose herself to the elites. I've met many in the meetup scene and have benefitted greatly from their expertise.
[+] [-] marquis|14 years ago|reply
Maybe she's not 'presentable' to a traditional recruiter (piercings, whatever). Maybe she's self-taught (is that really a big deal now?) Maybe she has children in Boston (I have friends who would LOVE to move but family keeps you in one place).
She's probably been working solo or in small teams where she's not exposed to team engineering. It sounds to me as if she's really keen to try this and will give everthing she's got to whoever takes a chance and interviews her.
[+] [-] abc_lisper|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] urbanjunkie|14 years ago|reply
- you're quick to jump to unsupported conclusions. Perhaps you could create some kind of mat for this.
- you're a bit of a traditionalist,
- you think resumes are better than actual contact
- Sarah has done a smart thing by allowing your type to self-select out of the game
[I await the downvote frenzy with a considerable amount of pleasure!]
[+] [-] mkr-hn|14 years ago|reply
All I see on the root of the domain is a test page for something called OpenPanel. That looks interesting. I passed it along to my web host.
[+] [-] zbruhnke|14 years ago|reply
I just don't know why an employer looking for a good front end dev would hire someone based on this, It does not prove any skill and mostly talks about how great she thinks she is, I am confused as to why this is even on the front page?
[+] [-] brk|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] afshin|14 years ago|reply
I wonder how many other web developers have spartan pages like this.
[+] [-] leejw00t354|14 years ago|reply
The page needs design.
[+] [-] hvassilev|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lysol|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Tichy|14 years ago|reply
Are there examples of programmers doing an impressive "hire me" page?
I am toying with the idea to turn my crappy web site into an Ultima clone. Instead of clicking links, visitors would have to walk through my realm.
[+] [-] wccrawford|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Allagash|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] katherinehague|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geargrinder|14 years ago|reply
However, bringing on a new person, even in that kind of role, consumes resources from the entire team as we get her up to speed. How long does it take to evaluate somebody like that? A few days? A week? I would pay her for her time though.
But why bring in Sarah? Why not somebody else who I have more information about? We often bring on contractors and sometimes end up hiring them. That is essentially a get-to-know-you-first relationship too.
So it would help to see some kind of work history, even if it is non-traditional. When hiring I look as much for self-direction as experience.
The good thing for Sarah and this approach is that she has been noticed, and we are talking about her. If she was located nearby I would just email her and ask for more details.
Let us know how it turns out, Sarah.
[+] [-] noelwelsh|14 years ago|reply
We're not in Boston and we're not hiring, but were that different I'd definitely talk to Sarah.
[+] [-] kaeluka|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flemmings|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]