top | item 29442794

(no title)

throwaway248329 | 4 years ago

The difference is that without fiat currency, the government can't inflate it's currency to pay off the debts. At the very least it means that the population does not have the risk of their savings becoming worthless anymore, and it probably also disincentives the lender to give money for such purposes.

discuss

order

lottin|4 years ago

So you admit that your whole point about governments not being able to borrow was nonsense? Good.

throwaway248329|4 years ago

Yes. The governments would still be able to borrow, but they won't be able to do it in an unchecked manner.

Since the lender would know that they are not guaranteed to get their money back at the expense of the borrower country's population.