I seriously doubt it. Lawyers can issue scary legal threats in their sleep. It's like yawning to them.
Threatening Mythbusters is probably a matter of 15 billable minutes of legal time. Whereas building a secure RFID is hundreds or thousands of engineering hours.
Here's something that just occurred to me: One reason why actual security is more expensive than lawyers is that your security team is up against black-hat hackers who are willing to spend hundreds of hours working -- anonymously, in secret, and without pay -- to defeat you. Whereas your legal team is generally not opposed by a black-hat legal team that is willing to spend hundreds of pro bono legal hours to try to defeat you in court. Particularly because you can't challenge a legal threat while simultaneously remaining anonymous and working in secret.
Interesting and unfortunate. I wish the Mythbusters didn't face this sort of pressure. Maybe they can still do the segment and then put it on their website. That is less predominate than their TV show.
With information like the defcon slides already readily available I'm surprised to see such pressure. I guess a segment on a cable TV show is more public than MIT student newspaper.
Does anyone know an easy/inexpensive way to "clone" an RFID card? (My work only lets me have one card, but I want to keep one in my car and one in a my wallet since I need it both in the garage and in the building.)
I figure it shouldn't be too hard, it's just sending out a radio frequency, right?
So first Adam claims they were pressured into dropping the segment.
Then bad publicity ensues and what do you know: Adam now claims he had a brain fart and all the big corporations say there just giddy over the Mythbusters segment. They were bending over backwards to help!
"Adam Savage's widely circulated YouTube video account of a pack of credit card industry giants pummeling Discovery Channel into deep-sixing a Mythbusters investigation aimed at RFID is now taking more of a beating than Buster the dummy absorbs on a typical episode of the show."
Why can't they just do the episode and keeping-in-line with past 'sensitive' topics like bomb making, skip over the part where they actually tell you how to do it?
Or would it even be possible given how easy it is?
i can't find a link to the experiment, but i saw something on rfid wardriving and hacking that involved setting up a node near gas station rfid payment nodules (similar to how ATM hackers set up fake fronts on the card insertions), intercepting the information that can get cracked or copied for use.
[+] [-] jrockway|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mechanical_fish|17 years ago|reply
Threatening Mythbusters is probably a matter of 15 billable minutes of legal time. Whereas building a secure RFID is hundreds or thousands of engineering hours.
Here's something that just occurred to me: One reason why actual security is more expensive than lawyers is that your security team is up against black-hat hackers who are willing to spend hundreds of hours working -- anonymously, in secret, and without pay -- to defeat you. Whereas your legal team is generally not opposed by a black-hat legal team that is willing to spend hundreds of pro bono legal hours to try to defeat you in court. Particularly because you can't challenge a legal threat while simultaneously remaining anonymous and working in secret.
[+] [-] jmatt|17 years ago|reply
With information like the defcon slides already readily available I'm surprised to see such pressure. I guess a segment on a cable TV show is more public than MIT student newspaper.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=271920
[+] [-] Protophore|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yan|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tocomment|17 years ago|reply
I figure it shouldn't be too hard, it's just sending out a radio frequency, right?
[+] [-] evgen|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] biohacker42|17 years ago|reply
Then bad publicity ensues and what do you know: Adam now claims he had a brain fart and all the big corporations say there just giddy over the Mythbusters segment. They were bending over backwards to help!
Shucks, what a silly misunderstanding!
[+] [-] hbien|17 years ago|reply
I had to re-read that first sentence a few times.
[+] [-] tlrobinson|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] josefresco|17 years ago|reply
Or would it even be possible given how easy it is?
[+] [-] thenextweb|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|17 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] noor420|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] incomethax|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] noodle|17 years ago|reply
i can't find a link to the experiment, but i saw something on rfid wardriving and hacking that involved setting up a node near gas station rfid payment nodules (similar to how ATM hackers set up fake fronts on the card insertions), intercepting the information that can get cracked or copied for use.