"Directory Opus (or "DOpus" as its users tend to call it) is a popular file manager program, originally written for the Amiga computer system in the early to mid-1990s. Commercial development on the version for the Amiga ceased in 1997. Directory Opus is still being actively developed and sold for the Microsoft Windows operating system by GPSoftware and there are open source releases of Directory Opus 4 and 5 for Amiga."
This is rather impressive and it looks appealing given what Windows looks like now. I came in with low expectations but its full of screenshots that actually show me why I should care and quite frankly it isn't done for a bunch of projects (even with people that have experience in it).
I’ve been using it since my Amiga days and when I found out they had it for the PC I gladly paid for it and an extra license I don’t even really use just because I wanted to support them.
Opus is magnificent. Gets rid of the need for so many other tools on Windows (archive management, previewers, bulk renamers, file sync tools, queued copy tools, duplicate finding, etc etc).
All in one super fast, integrated product that is constantly updated and has been rock solid for, literally, decades.
Sounds like it has some nice features. Bulk rename is one I'd use right away. My biggest gripe ATM with explorer is that it rearranges the tree while it's opening. At first my favorites are at the top and in focus but about 500ms after opening it moves the cursor down to My Documents, often undoing my first directory selection.
Windows is doing this sort of thing in a number of places for me. It's like someone decided "async is cool!" and no one told them that interrupting the user is bad.
> It's like someone decided "async is cool!" and no one told them that interrupting the user is bad.
A ton of application are doing that now. I think it has become the prevalent paradigm in many places, as a bad application of optimistic event handling.
I imagine the devs thinking "It will surely load fast enough so it's not an issue", or "we can't block user interaction until everything's loaded, when the files they need might stay displayed at the same place the whole time" etc.
It's particularly bad with task managers loading task lists asynchronously, when some of the first items might only be loaded last, and the list continuously moves top and down while it's loading.
It also seems to have a delay between starting every program. I tried to shove all my startup programs into a single batch file and run them in parallel and my PC is ready in 2 seconds. It may have made sense in the past, but with speedy CPUs and SSDs it's just an artificial bottleneck now. But I guess we're in the minority of people actually shutting down their machines any more...
I believe it's always possible to do better, and I will try DO out.
However, ironically, windows file explorer is one of those parts of ms-windows I normally appreciate, as being "more good than bad".
In particular, I love the shell integration in Explorer. Even if it is a messed-up compromise. I love that with the explorer tortoise-git integration, I get git menus directly in explorer. Which means, in a random application, I can trigger the "load file" or "save as" explorer-dialog, and use the explorer context menu do do git commands or zip/unzip stuff, in a random application that knows nothing about git or zip.
Compromise: I know the shell integration is buggy, and thus a nightmare for developers - the developer behind tortoise-git is flooded with bug reports stemming from conflicts with other buggily-implemented explorer-extensions that are not his fault.
Also, in a world with 8billion people, it is probably a nightmare to let "everyone" add menu items to the context menu - envision 500 sub-menu items.
Both on linux and windows, I dream of an "explorer nirvana",
where the following is solved to perfection:
-relevant context-menus for all file-types.
-"perfect" 'application-versus-documents-assocatation', so the system knows which applications MAY support a given filetype, and the user dynamically can enable/disable a file association (I don't want the user to delete any file association, only to DISABLE it).
- perfectly registered file-viewers, so the details/preview pane can always easily preview any file.
Windows Explorer, in my mind, scores high on this, mostly based on efforts back before 2005; hopefully they won't squander it all.
If I was a linux distro, my attack vector would be an awesome 'file explorer/previewer'.
My pet peeve in windows explorer, is that file byte size isn't offered as one of the configurable columns.
My pet enthusiasm on explorer is, that for many years this as been available as a third-party extension, which highlights what a good design windows explorer has.
Since the end of windows 7/arrival of windows 8, I regard
microsoft as incapable of ever building something as great as windows explorer, sadly.
The cathedral OS with a consistent UI look & feel (including navigation shortcuts and behaviour),
seems to be an art lost with the redmond roman empire of the nineties,
and now we must live in perpetual Electron Hell,
where UI's are built to be operated with a nose.
e.g. those of attribute changer https://www.petges.lu/ modifies metadata between source and destination without changing the underlying identical files.
e.g. personally find winmerge and winscp a simpler solution to some aspects of comparison and synchronisation (but need setup)
Overall I do use Opus regularly but largely to just get a count of the contents of a directory (avoiding a manual file propperties right click on the folder.)
I appreciate the software development costs, but £25 for a single node locked license is steep. I'd like to see that extended to at least a couple of PCs + a laptop as many advanced users (who can regex :) ) are likely to have at least a couple of PCs round the house in these work from home days.
Overall 3.5 out of five - undeniably powerful but interface is too fussy
> appreciate the software development costs, but £25 for a single node locked license is steep.
Total Commander is 50% more expensive than that. I was going to say that it's worse value because of it, then I realised that not only is it a multi-computer license for the registered user, but that also the past 15-20 years of updates would have been free if I bought it.
That's actually decent. I'm part of the Linux ecosystem for now (so I can't run it other than Wine), but if I was on Windows, I'd likely invest in a license. Considering that it's still being updated for new machines after so long, and retains support all the way back to Windows 95, it's good value for money.
> I appreciate the software development costs, but £25 for a single node locked license is steep. I'd like to see that extended to at least a couple of PCs + a laptop as many advanced users (who can regex :) ) are likely to have at least a couple of PCs round the house in these work from home days.
Ignoring the cost, Directory Opus is one of the few pieces of software that I have not encountered licensing issues with. Need to reinstall Windows, the certificate is applied without a fuss. Need to transfer the license to a new computer, the certificate is applied without a fuss. Using an old version, the certificate is applied without a fuss and disabling the update manager means it won't pester you to upgrade. The only time I was grumpy with their support policies was when I had to upgrade to update SSH support.
Some further thoughts and a more positive spin based on watching the (breathtakingly fast) what's new video...
Several of the features regarding merging, synchronisation, metadata handling are available now (not in the 'DOpus 12 light' release from 2017 I was using).
I will gladly pay my money for the pro version and look forward to using the latest version with my own cat videos.
(Still consider the features as too configurable and not easily 'discoverable' particularly for 'normal' rather than 'tech' users)
I also recognise how amazingly talented the small DOpus12 team are. They've implemented something that Microsoft should have done....
I understand why someone created it and why people use it. For similar reasons I use FAR. I feel it makes little sense to try to replace Explorer (and any other standard WIndows tools) as it inevitably leads to problems sooner or later. FAR, being an addition, doesn't get in the way, is open and has a plethora of plugins. To me, it seems the most faithful descendant of Norton Commander.
Thanks for that trip down memory lane. I just searched for FAR and had a warm, nostalgic feeling viewing the screenshots. Norton Commander was one of my favorite tools and I missed it so for years as technology moved forward. I eventually replaced it with DO but moved when XYplorer offered a freebie one year. Haven't looked back since... until now.
My favorite (and free) explorer alternative is [Q-Dir](http://www.softwareok.com/?seite=Freeware/Q-Dir), which is unique because it offers 4 panes, instead of usual 2. It was almost a life changing tool for me, especially when dealing with multiple directories at the same time, like copying files from one directory to multiple directories. It has a little quirky UI. I've probably used almost every other file manager, like xyplorer, qttabbar, salanamder, mucommander, onecommander, etc, but I always come back to Qdir.
Almost certainly something has installed an extension which is in-process and causing the crash. Graphics drivers installing thumbnail previewers for video files caused this for me previously.
Mine crashes too every once in a while, it hangs for a bit and then closes losing the entire desktop. No error is shown but there is one in the application event log. I tried to investigate the cause of the crashes but led me to a dead end, maybe you'll have better luck.
Technically, you keep the Explorer shell. That being said, the default configuration will pull up a Directory Opus window in virtually all of the cases that an Explorer window would be called up (e.g. opening a folder, compressed file, or FTP/SFTP URL). In other words, you will see the desktop but not much else.
Unfortunately there is not. Many will argue for whatever file explorer is their favourite, but all of them miss the mark by a wide margin. DirectoryOpus is a veritable Swiss Army Knife (with a freshly sharpened blade) of functionality. I've been using it on all of my Windows machines for many years, and it is one of those pieces of software that whenever I switch over to my Linux machine I very much miss. As a sidenote, PathFinder on macOS is a good Finder replacement, but again, lacks much of the functionality that DirectoryOpus provides.
Not as far as I know, but it does have "flat mode," which I've never seen anywhere else. Flat mode displays files from all the subfolders in a single list, quite handy for bulk operations.
[+] [-] doener|4 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory_Opus
[+] [-] hzlatar|4 years ago|reply
I am happy to see that the idea is still alive. Although, I don't use Windows anymore.
[+] [-] zitterbewegung|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] imajoo|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bossanova808|4 years ago|reply
All in one super fast, integrated product that is constantly updated and has been rock solid for, literally, decades.
[+] [-] intrepidhero|4 years ago|reply
Windows is doing this sort of thing in a number of places for me. It's like someone decided "async is cool!" and no one told them that interrupting the user is bad.
[+] [-] makeitdouble|4 years ago|reply
A ton of application are doing that now. I think it has become the prevalent paradigm in many places, as a bad application of optimistic event handling.
I imagine the devs thinking "It will surely load fast enough so it's not an issue", or "we can't block user interaction until everything's loaded, when the files they need might stay displayed at the same place the whole time" etc.
It's particularly bad with task managers loading task lists asynchronously, when some of the first items might only be loaded last, and the list continuously moves top and down while it's loading.
[+] [-] atoav|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tareqak|4 years ago|reply
Here is one source about how to disable it: https://www.howtogeek.com/403162/how-to-disable-the-windows-... (I searched for "windows startup delay").
[+] [-] sippeangelo|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jfrunyon|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fifticon|4 years ago|reply
Both on linux and windows, I dream of an "explorer nirvana", where the following is solved to perfection: -relevant context-menus for all file-types. -"perfect" 'application-versus-documents-assocatation', so the system knows which applications MAY support a given filetype, and the user dynamically can enable/disable a file association (I don't want the user to delete any file association, only to DISABLE it). - perfectly registered file-viewers, so the details/preview pane can always easily preview any file. Windows Explorer, in my mind, scores high on this, mostly based on efforts back before 2005; hopefully they won't squander it all. If I was a linux distro, my attack vector would be an awesome 'file explorer/previewer'.
My pet peeve in windows explorer, is that file byte size isn't offered as one of the configurable columns. My pet enthusiasm on explorer is, that for many years this as been available as a third-party extension, which highlights what a good design windows explorer has.
Since the end of windows 7/arrival of windows 8, I regard microsoft as incapable of ever building something as great as windows explorer, sadly. The cathedral OS with a consistent UI look & feel (including navigation shortcuts and behaviour), seems to be an art lost with the redmond roman empire of the nineties, and now we must live in perpetual Electron Hell, where UI's are built to be operated with a nose.
[+] [-] mintyc|4 years ago|reply
Some additional features would be useful.
e.g. those of attribute changer https://www.petges.lu/ modifies metadata between source and destination without changing the underlying identical files.
e.g. personally find winmerge and winscp a simpler solution to some aspects of comparison and synchronisation (but need setup)
Overall I do use Opus regularly but largely to just get a count of the contents of a directory (avoiding a manual file propperties right click on the folder.)
I appreciate the software development costs, but £25 for a single node locked license is steep. I'd like to see that extended to at least a couple of PCs + a laptop as many advanced users (who can regex :) ) are likely to have at least a couple of PCs round the house in these work from home days.
Overall 3.5 out of five - undeniably powerful but interface is too fussy
[+] [-] selfhoster11|4 years ago|reply
Total Commander is 50% more expensive than that. I was going to say that it's worse value because of it, then I realised that not only is it a multi-computer license for the registered user, but that also the past 15-20 years of updates would have been free if I bought it.
That's actually decent. I'm part of the Linux ecosystem for now (so I can't run it other than Wine), but if I was on Windows, I'd likely invest in a license. Considering that it's still being updated for new machines after so long, and retains support all the way back to Windows 95, it's good value for money.
[+] [-] II2II|4 years ago|reply
Ignoring the cost, Directory Opus is one of the few pieces of software that I have not encountered licensing issues with. Need to reinstall Windows, the certificate is applied without a fuss. Need to transfer the license to a new computer, the certificate is applied without a fuss. Using an old version, the certificate is applied without a fuss and disabling the update manager means it won't pester you to upgrade. The only time I was grumpy with their support policies was when I had to upgrade to update SSH support.
[+] [-] mintyc|4 years ago|reply
Several of the features regarding merging, synchronisation, metadata handling are available now (not in the 'DOpus 12 light' release from 2017 I was using).
I will gladly pay my money for the pro version and look forward to using the latest version with my own cat videos.
(Still consider the features as too configurable and not easily 'discoverable' particularly for 'normal' rather than 'tech' users)
I also recognise how amazingly talented the small DOpus12 team are. They've implemented something that Microsoft should have done....
[+] [-] hdjjhhvvhga|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] c_prompt|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jaclaz|4 years ago|reply
http://www.softpanorama.org/OFM/index.shtml http://www.softpanorama.org/OFM/Paradigm/index.shtml
As a side note, 7-zip doubles as two panes file manager, not "orthodox" but still good enough for normal tasks.
[+] [-] lstodd|4 years ago|reply
FAR was much later, and quite much more that either.
Then there's Total Commander ...
[+] [-] rk06|4 years ago|reply
does Directory Opus support it? or has an acceptable workaround for it?
[+] [-] jay_kyburz|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vasili111|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] greenbush|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RachelF|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] otterpro|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] locusm|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joshxyz|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Brian_K_White|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] FascistDonut|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pjc50|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RedShift1|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Rerarom|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] II2II|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ThinkBeat|4 years ago|reply
Just as a standalone application, or to replace explorer.
[+] [-] albert_e|4 years ago|reply
>> Click thumbnails to embiggen
[+] [-] falsaberN1|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ClueslessTech99|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] justinlloyd|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shmerl|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] emj|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] duckmysick|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] falsaberN1|4 years ago|reply
A clone of an earlier version of DOpus, Worker, exists as well: http://www.boomerangsworld.de/cms/worker/index.html
I used this for a while before settling with Krusader, but I was not dissatisfied.
[+] [-] snvzz|4 years ago|reply
[0]: http://www.boomerangsworld.de/cms/worker/
[+] [-] moogly|4 years ago|reply
Completely indispensable on a Windows machine.
[+] [-] bloopernova|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kumarsw|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] g8oz|4 years ago|reply