[keville]

It is not necessary to create any extraneous data structures to do OP's one-liner. This creates n+1 new arrays that must be garbage-collected.

[runarberg]

Object.fromEntries takes iterable, so if you have a map from a handy iterator library you could get rid of the parent array returned from `bar.map`.

    import { map } from "my-iter-lib";
    
    Object.fromEntries(map((v) => [v.id, v], bar));

Or with the proposed iterator-helpers:

    Object.fromEntries(
      Iterator.from(bar).map((v) => [v.id, v]),
    )

However the inner arrays are harder to get rid of... In fact even OP’s oneliner defines the inner arrays. I would hope there were some engine optimizations though which could minimize their footprint.

[keville]

Please see my other comment in this thread for the `reduce`-based solution that requires no extra data structures. They're not that hard to get rid of!