top | item 29566630

(no title)

nauticacom | 4 years ago

Right, but the entire point of my comment was that "takes up a significant part of the language spec, compiler, and VM" is not a good approximation of complexity. It can be related, but it is not necessarily true that something with a complex implementation has a complex interface.

discuss

order

remus|4 years ago

I think we are talking past each other a bit, as I completely agree with

> it is not necessarily true that something with a complex implementation has a complex interface.

In turn, my point is that as a language implementer you only have so much time available to work on the language and surrounding ecosystem. If your time is spent dealing with a complex spec, compiler and VM then you have less time to spend on the rest of the ecosystem. I think go has shown that spending tim on the surrounding ecosystem can be very valuable (e.g. go fmt, go vet and more recently go fuzz).

nauticacom|4 years ago

Ah, I understand now. That's a fair point! I agree that the excellent Go tooling is one of its strengths.