top | item 29637785

(no title)

najqh | 4 years ago

I disagree with him, but he makes a solid point, and many people think like him.

HN is enough of an echo chamber as it is, don't make it worse.

discuss

order

ben_w|4 years ago

The article says:

"""The main criticism was that it is simply impossible to rule out that a backdoor - once it is built - is abused by criminals or undemocratic regimes. A lowering of the security level would immediately affect all users - and not just those who are the subject of a judicial investigation."""

The comment says:

> I'm glad you're keeping safe dealers, pedophiles, and other criminals as well as their lawyers.

This does not look like a solid point to me; it looks like rhetoric.

1337shadow|4 years ago

Citing two different passages from the article:

> This draft included a passage that would have forced companies such as WhatsApp and Signal to decrypt their encrypted chats upon request by the authorities for criminal investigation.

> Belgian intellectuals like Professor Bart Preneel said that "by putting a backdoor into Whatsapp, you would make it less safe for everyone".

This does not look like a solid point to me; it looks like rhetoric. Anyway:

> a backdoor - once it is built - is abused by criminals or undemocratic regimes.

If they can get their hands on a governmental private key, which is unlikely.