(no title)
GDC7 | 4 years ago
The worst thing is that the majority of the American population would have not found themselves competing against Bill Gates for anything, except those in DC who had him as their #1 enemy in order to win their size measuring contest.
Matter of fact the small individual consumer and small businesses were getting away robbing Microsoft blind as they didn't do anything to stop piracy.
Microsoft would just treat it as free marketing or just pass those losses onto big paying customers such as the Fortune 500 companies, thus compensating for piracy losses at the base of the pyramid.
After DOJ intervention nowadays we have Apple shipping a 1700$ phone which is completely closed off and out of the box is impossible to charge while listening to music at the same time. Irony if you think about how passionate Jobs was about music
yjftsjthsd-h|4 years ago
Microsoft didn't win on technical merit, they were winning because they were aggressively anti-competitive.
GDC7|4 years ago
teakettle42|4 years ago
Even the base model iPhone SE ($399) has an external speaker, bluetooth, and airplay, all of which are capable of playing music while charging at the same time.
What a strange complaint to make, and it’s even stranger to tie it to your even stranger take on the DOJ and Microsoft.
GDC7|4 years ago
Had the DOJ not attacked Microsoft we'd have a better, more open phone which would also come out of the box with the ability to play music while charging.
iPhones made in 2012 were only barely better than Pocket PCs made in 2005
jen20|4 years ago
macintux|4 years ago
Still, for most people it's not their first such device, so they already typically have their own infrastructure of chargers and BT headsets etc.