(no title)
volkse
|
4 years ago
It has been discussed many times before - the issue with the SA data is that 80% of the population have been exposed to the virus (either had it or have been vaccinated) so the deaths not budging there can be very misleading for countries with lower vaccination rates.
arn|4 years ago
The denominator is higher than if, let’s say, delta was let loose in the same population at the same time.
wholinator2|4 years ago
The wording startled me until I understood the intended meaning.
toolz|4 years ago
There's no indication that the first world, with much higher vaccination rates won't fare better than South Africa, which seems to be faring exceptionally well relative to other case spikes.
SideburnsOfDoom|4 years ago
"have been exposed to the virus" usually means something like "immune system isn't totally unprepared, but has had contact with this virus before (or a proxy via vaccination)".
In South Africa, it is mostly via getting COVID-19 in the Alpha or Delta waves.
Yes, over 70% of South Africans have had it:
https://www.businesslive.co.za/bloomberg/news/2021-12-14-ove...
crummy|4 years ago
AuryGlenz|4 years ago
That immunity may very well work better than the vaccines on omicron - I don’t think we’re far enough in to it to have a great idea of that yet.
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]
kelnos|4 years ago
cpncrunch|4 years ago
tome|4 years ago
https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-m...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29654645
richarme|4 years ago
tanseydavid|4 years ago
stillicidious|4 years ago
Finally with local statistics, you still have political dramatics like https://twitter.com/dancohen3000/status/1473480933579923456
exdsq|4 years ago
JPKab|4 years ago
hammock|4 years ago
lkbm|4 years ago
[0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34735425/
[1] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.12.21263461v...
zerocount|4 years ago
andybak|4 years ago