(no title)
AstroDogCatcher | 4 years ago
Linux OS package managers are, almost by necessity, full of outdated packages which are not the versions I want to use for day-to-day CLI applications. Snaps, Flatpaks and AppImages all have their own downsides due to half-baked isolation goals and the associated usability compromises. Language-specific package managers are a mixed bag, but too narrow in scope when thinking about usage of tools rather than development based on libraries. Maybe Nix or the Arch AUR are a better option, but they come with a learning curve and/or stability compromise. I don't care how the packages are arranged on my Mac; the system is too locked down for me to really have the level of control I'd like anyway, so better to just accept the usability advantages and get on withy life.
pxc|4 years ago
This is a valuable perspective. I wonder how much macOS primes users in general to value usability over other dimensions of good design.
(I also wonder how much better a time I'd have on macOS if I adopted this attitude.)
Maursault|4 years ago