[firethief]

`for` is a foreach. If you want to increment a number through a range like a typical C `for`, you have to use a `while` loop. I don't really see the draw.

[dnautics]

man if I were andrew I'd just rename for to "foreach", because this is a huge complaint and source of confusion.

[kzrdude]

Seems fine to me. Rust has a "foreach" which is named for, working ok. Of course Rust has ranges as iterators, so it's not necessarily noticed that "there is no numerical for" but it works.

[anonymoushn]

It seems fine to just delete it if it's only ever going to work on slices and arrays