[gareim]

From one page before the table (which itself is on page 7):

> An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication.

If I gave 42,086 people a cup of water as my experiment, some non-zero number of people will die in the ensuing 90 days. Without analysis, your comment only serves to inflame.

EDIT: I think the 42,086 number I used was misleading because that appears to be the total number of reports and not the number of people that actually received the vaccine in that time period. Which means the rates are lower as the denominator is way larger than 42,086.

[barbacoa]

The number of doses given is redacted which makes any kind of numerical analysis impossible.

[lalaland1125]

Then why post data that you yourself know is not suitable for analysis?

Seems like the definition of bad faith.