(no title)
fart32 | 4 years ago
While that indeed is an advantage, it's not why they're dominant, and I'm not sure it's simply a question of funding either.
Let's be honest, compared to IRC, Discord and Slack are very easy to use. All it takes to join a server is clicking a link. IRC protocol is just as old as me, and I, to this day, remember the struggle as a kid of joining empty channels before finally understanding the concept of networks. Back in the day, you'd need a special friend with ZNC to be the cool kid. Since then, audience has changed dramatically and most people don't even know what "protocol" means.
IRC just doesn't offer what it takes to get everyone on board.
OJFord|4 years ago
There are a few easy 'just click a link' web clients I've used (via doing exactly that from a GitHub readme or similar) - but you connect and then you have no history, no idea (without waiting a bit) if there's an ongoing discussion, no idea what it's about if there is. Then you go afk and if you get disconnected only to reconnect later, you have no idea if someone answered your question during the time you were offline.
(I like & 'support' & want to use Matrix, but haven't yet.)
buovjaga|4 years ago
Ticket for ratifying CHATHISTORY, tracking implementations: https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/437
rhizome|4 years ago
charcircuit|4 years ago
But if you are looking for people to talk to, but they don't use IRC (read: almost everyone) there is no reason to use IRC. If I wanted to talk about speedrunning a game I will go to Discord because that's where the community is, not on some IRC server.
dmitriid|4 years ago
And which mature client would that be?
And which clients would work for Linux laptops, and MacOS laptops, and Windows laptops? And also company-issued Android phones and iPhones?
And who would be maintaining the servers for IRC with all the necessary things to make it meet expectations in the modern world?
Kye|4 years ago