(no title)
brucelidl | 4 years ago
But I do have to be realistic, the Nimby feelings in this town are VERY strong. Everybody who buys a house here seems to feel the town should stay exactly the way it was on the day after they arrived, without any recognition of how blinkered that is. The legal fight against something like this would be intense, to say the least. It would require a developer with great lawyers, very deep pockets and the thickest of skins.
vinhboy|4 years ago
While I don't consider myself a NIMBY, because I wouldn't go out of my way to stop a development project, I do appreciate how it has kept Davis a really nice place to live.
I now live in Elk Grove, there are 3 Walmart within 5 minutes of me. Urban sprawl here is ridiculous and can be measured by how many dead skunks, and homeless coyotes you find on the road because farm land and wild spaces are turning into giant air conditioned homes (which I am totally guilty of owning). Folsom, Rancho Cordova, Roseville are the same. If you want to see what happens when Davis grow into a giant city, move to one of these places.
I am not sure what my point is. I guess I am just saying that what Davis is, is not bad, it can be worse.
But for the sake of conversation, if we are going to raze small towns like Davis in the quest of more housing friendly cities, I recommend we model it after Bellevue, WA. They have skyscrapers, and it's beautiful. But then again, that just speaks to the wealth disparity more than anything else... Which is also what keeps Davis so nice.
kristopolous|4 years ago
If people afraid of sprawl say no to vertical, then horizontal is going to happen just outside of wherever they care about.
Many people's politics are wildly irrationally disconnected from their sentiments.
I used to live in Davis. If I was King, I'd steamroll everything between A&B and 1st and Russell and replace it with ~30-40 story apartment buildings with multilevel bike parking like in Amsterdam (ex: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1e/c4/d7/1ec4d7a99c2151699afe...), and rooftop bars and cafes.
The walls would be a mix of vertical gardening (ex: https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/htt...) and photovoltaic windows. The bottom floors would have retail and dedicated community space.
The buildings would further have multi-level skywalks connecting them with small nook like terraces (ex: https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/59f1/27ba/b22e/38e2/a...)
There would intentionally, by design, be zero parking spaces except to accommodate the handicapped.
That's as Davis as you're going to get while actually solving the problem
kevinburke|4 years ago
Davis has one of the highest bicycle mode shares of any city in the state. It’s an ideal place to add denser housing without the additional traffic or parking lots that blight a lot of bigger (and less dense) cities.
andrewia|4 years ago
So I'd say Elk Grove's sprawl was driven by NIMBY-style regulation that encouraged low density housing and failed to address the effects of hopscotch development. Within those failures, Elk Grove has a few gimpses of higher density and urban planning, as well as anecdotes about the benefits of mixing different socioeconomic classes.
nappy|4 years ago
ballenf|4 years ago
I guess housing prices wouldn't rise as quickly, but I doubt that's a big part of the motivation.
brendan5555|4 years ago
TulliusCicero|4 years ago
It's possible to develop in a way that doesn't involve giant strip malls and tons more cars, y'know. Most YIMBY's are urbanists, and would be much more in favor of supporting walking, biking and transit, rather than cars cars cars.
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]
dandellion|4 years ago
SubiculumCode|4 years ago
edit: for those curious about Davis, visit the wiki: https://localwiki.org/davis/
anyfactor|4 years ago
wsinks|4 years ago
I was fortunate to always live in Davis while I went there, but it definitely wasn't inexpensive!
rob74|4 years ago
> Jon Snow: What did father use to say? Everything before the word "but" is horse sh|t.
"I would support something like this [...] but fortunately it's only theoretical, because there are enough NIMBYs to make sure it has no chance of actually happening"
But I know the feeling, that was me one year ago: "I would love to get a Covid vaccine right away, but (fortunately) there are people with higher priorities who have to get it (and field test it) first". But I have to mention that I did get vaccinated eventually...
brucelidl|4 years ago
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]