top | item 29964381

(no title)

wombatmobile | 4 years ago

Nature

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2012.11555

Scientific American

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dinos-dna-demise-...

The Royal Society

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2012.174...

Scitech Daily

https://scitechdaily.com/researchers-calculate-that-dna-has-...

discuss

order

ramraj07|4 years ago

Thanks. Looks like the royal society link is the original work, but the nature editorial also mentions the same - it’s still possible we might have higher stability in other conditions (they only loooked at dna in bone samples). Not saying we will hold hope for dinosaur cloning, just that 521 years sounds too small.

beowulfey|4 years ago

DNA is stable, but still susceptible to hydrolysis. Water will eventually degrade it down to constitutive parts.