Has this result appeared in any publications yet? It should be pretty easy to check, as the post says, but I'm curious to know if it will be written up. I'd be interested to see how they found the particular chunk of agar and whether there was evidence suggesting they look there.
dvgrn|4 years ago
https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=140258#p140258
The previous "Grand^N Orphan" result involved a complete enumeration of the relevant 6x3 agars, but this "Unique Father" result was a partial enumeration of 6x6 agars, I think, just until a working example was found.
At least one independent verification has been done:
https://conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=140277#p140277
dvgrn|4 years ago
https://discord.com/channels/357922255553953794/370571014654...