[tybit]

This would be an interesting article to flesh out. I.e is there evidence that MySQL is more reliable in those ways?

I always prefer reliability over features even though I’m a product engineer so if he’s right it’d be good to know. Either way, I’m stuck with the MySQL that the infrastructure engineers at work have provided us with.

[jpgvm]

It's not more reliable on those dimensions but it is "easier". For most cases you can enable statement based replication in MySQL and put it into semi-sync mode and it will mostly do what you want.

PostgreSQL on the other hand is less of a fully finished database w.r.t replication and more like a set of incredibly powerful tools that let you build the scale out, partitioned, replicated, CDC friendly/etc database cluster of your dreams. You can mix and match nodes setup with physical replication vs logical replication, you can use partitioning and table inheritance to increase scalability and hide the fact the database is actually distributed across many nodes/clusters from your application, etc.

I think there is probably some lag/delta here where PostgreSQL doesn't have an easy enough/simple enough story for basic replication modes outside of basic physical replication.