(no title)
cmpb
|
4 years ago
I was confused at first because the article mentions that "a spacecraft bound for the center of the solar system would need to slow itself down" and "engineers must take Parker past Venus seven times throughout the mission, so that the spacecraft can use that planet’s gravity as a brake", but you mention that PSP is traveling very fast (and indeed I've always understood that items orbiting closer to the center travel faster). Is this just a dumbing-down in the article's verbiage, or is it common to think of shrinking the perihelion as "braking"?
areoform|4 years ago
For the particle to fall straight "down" to the sun, in a straight line, you would have to cancel all of its orbital velocity.
That's why it's difficult to get close to the sun and it requires a lot of energy. You have to subtract out a large part of Earth's orbital velocity.
But that's just one part of the explanation. It's not intuitive per se (I imagine it as a play between kinetic and potential energies), but the closer you are to a body, the faster your orbit. The farther out the "slower" your orbit.
It's the opposite of a disc.
denton-scratch|4 years ago
If I get you right, the braking slows the orbiting object down. But that slow-down causes it to move to a lower orbit, losing potential energy in exchange for increased orbital velocity. And the velocity you drop in high orbit, you gain with interest as you move to low orbit.
So braking makes you go faster.
samhuk|4 years ago
areoform|4 years ago
cmpb|4 years ago
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]