top | item 29980722

The PinePhone Pro brings upgraded hardware to the Linux phone

113 points| rbanffy | 4 years ago |arstechnica.com | reply

66 comments

order
[+] buscoquadnary|4 years ago|reply
My Pixel just died I am going to get a pinephone to replace it. What has anyone else's experience with a PinePhone been like?

EDIT: If the PinePhone isn't a good choice is there another good more FOSSy phone I can turn to? I am sick of Google, and I have neither the inclination nor funds to join the apple ecosystem, anything else I could do?

[+] mjard|4 years ago|reply
Slow, short battery life, buggy. You don't want this for your daily driver.

Now, it is a fun toy to play with. PostmarketOS with SXMO is an interesting experiment and I love the idea of a pocketable linux computer with a modem. It could potentially even be a phone if people stop trying to treat it like a feature phone and accept that you are running on limited hardware and software needs to be written as such.

[+] mpol|4 years ago|reply
> is there another good more FOSSy phone I can turn to?

I have been using Sailfish OS from Jolla since 2014 as daily driver and only phone. It is usable as a daily driver but you can notice it doesn't have the billions of development time poured into it like Google and Apple do. It is not 100% open source, but it is real lInux with systemd, wayland, ssh as root, etcetera. I am using it now on a Sony Xperia XA2 that I bought second hand 2 years ago for 110 Euro, together with 50 Euro for Android App Support it works fine for my usecase. Before that I used the original Jolla 1 for 5 years. That device had support from Jolla from 2013 untill 2020, 7 years in total. Choosing a phone for Sailfish today, I probably would end up with a Sony Xperia 10 or Sony Xperia 10 II.

[+] kop316|4 years ago|reply
I have been using the OG Pinephone full time for a month in the US (Mobian Phosh). I am able to use VoLTE Calls, SMS, MMS, Visual Voicemail (so all of the basic feature phone stuff works).

It is very very slow however. Firefox takes 40 (EDIT: ok more like 15-20) seconds to load, and I don't even bother to load heavy resource sites without uMatrix.

Also, battery life is not great. Screen on time is 3-4 hours, and standby time is approximately 12 hours.

[+] ydlr|4 years ago|reply
It can be fun to play with, but if you need a telephone, you should look elsewhere. It is a coin flip whether an incoming call or SMS will be recieved.
[+] opan|4 years ago|reply
Just get something with LineageOS support and then flash that without gapps. That's the currently-usable solution. I do have a PinePhone and hope it continues to improve also.

Maybe even find something supported by both LineageOS and postmarketOS, like the OnePlus 6. That'll get you closer to something like a PinePhone in the same device if you so desire it.

[+] goffi|4 years ago|reply
> If the PinePhone isn't a good choice is there another good more FOSSy phone I can turn to? I am sick of Google, and I have neither the inclination nor funds to join the apple ecosystem, anything else I could do?

Maybe have a look at the Fairphone, the last iteration seems neat, and it's compatible with several FOSS OSes (at least Android based ones, but I think other too).

Best is to use a second hand/refurbished phone: better for the planet, the price, and you can choose carefully a model compatible with the FOSS OS you would like to have.

PinePhone (Pro) is not (yet?) good as a daily driver, but it's a great platform if you want to develop for various OSes (booting on a new OS is as easy as switching SD card). With the new keyboard accessory, it's a great super small and portable computer, and the community is very active.

[+] niemenmaa|4 years ago|reply
Recommend checking out the SailfishOS[0] by Jolla. I have daily driven it on Xperia XA2 and XA10 II and it works "well enough" and is mostly open [1]. I have bought the OS so the phone has Android app support. This review resembles my experiences well [2].

E: I noticed that currently purchasing SailfishOS from outside ofl Europe is "prohibited" according to the purchase page. That is a bummer for non-europeans.

[0] https://sailfishos.org/

[1] https://sailfishos.org/info/

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbYPoiZh8wg&t=150

[+] loser777|4 years ago|reply
I got a "beta edition" PinePhone circa Sept. 2021 that wouldn't run without locking up or resetting for more than a minute at a time. Tried a bunch of images with different memory frequency settings but no dice.

Mine was probably just a dud but it was still an expensive paperweight.

[+] wlarro|4 years ago|reply
The PinePhone doesn't have the performance, battery life, or application ecosystem to be a primary phone. LineageOS or one of the other de-googled Android distributions are worth checking out.
[+] NikolaeVarius|4 years ago|reply
Do not use as a daily driver. It is a useful toy, but requires massive amounts of more development
[+] magicjosh|4 years ago|reply
I bought a Pinephone a few months ago. It is not ready for a daily driver. It's a dev project still. An important, crucial project, but still in dev. Others have said this as well so will end my comment here.
[+] wffurr|4 years ago|reply
Wow, RK3399 is the performance option. I recall the GPU in that device being extremely slow to the point where it was quite difficult to get the inking performance in Google Keep to be acceptable instead of terrible. That was in 2016.

And now in the Year of Our Lord 2022 it's being marketed as a "pro" phone?

[+] yjftsjthsd-h|4 years ago|reply
On the one hand, yes, it'd be nice to have faster options. On the other hand, yes, this is the best CPU that meets the constraints of the system (probably, "supports a SoC with drivers and datasheets available")
[+] opan|4 years ago|reply
I think GPU performance is still continuing to improve on the software side. Most SBCs have such poor drivers that their full potential is never seen.
[+] notswiley2|4 years ago|reply
Linux Apps don't benefit much from the fancy GPUs unless you're running eg wayland. If you're mostly using Xterm, muPDF, Firefox etc. the GPU on the original is plenty fast.
[+] lvass|4 years ago|reply
Do these phones run mainline distros e.g. Debian? I'm thinking about getting one just for occasional ssh. Even a tty with the keyboard addon would be fine. Regular phones these days are such massive spyware that I'm not even willing to trust ssh keys inside them.
[+] notswiley2|4 years ago|reply
Well there are volunteer groups that add extra packages to these distros and build images for them (mobian -> debian, alarm -> arch, PMOS -> alpine.) I think a lot of it will get upstreamed to Debian (if it hasn't already.)

On mine I run PMOS configured nearly the same way I have my other computers configured (same WM and everything.)

[+] CameronNemo|4 years ago|reply
FWIW Debian can run on the pinebookpro, which uses a similar soc as the pinephonepro (rk3399 vs. rk3399s). There are a few kernel changes needed, but they might be mainlined by the next LTS.

So I would say maybe in a year or so Debian testing could run on it.

[+] kop316|4 years ago|reply
If you are interested in Debian, look at: https://mobian-project.org/

I would call it....sort of official? It isn't Debian per se, but many of the devs working on it also are working with Debian to get as much upstreamed as possible (or are affiliated with Debian proper). It also tries to use upstream Debian packages as much as possible.

I run that (and develop for it!), and I have ssh on it.

[+] abdullahkhalids|4 years ago|reply
What are the critical innovations needed to get the OS usable for a non-tech person only interested in Phonecalls, SMS, and pictures?
[+] notswiley2|4 years ago|reply
It's pretty much all there, it just needs to be packaged.

Also most people don't like carrying a compass and road atlas like I do so the turn by turn navigation needs to work (KDE marble will stick you on a slippy map and route for you but I don't think it does real time navigation right now.)

[+] kop316|4 years ago|reply
Depending on your carrier (I live in the US so I can only speak to them), Calls, MMS, SMS already work just fine.

As far as pictures....the Camera on the OG Pinephone is not great, I would not use it to take serious pictures (or I am bad at taking pictures, which may also be true!). The Pinephone Pro has a much better Camera, but so far, it does not work in software.

[+] beebeepka|4 years ago|reply
I guess I'll have to wait another 5 years before going back to having a pocket computer.

It's just not ready, and won't be for a while. I guess not many people want a full blown Linux pc in their pockets. A shame really

[+] pmontra|4 years ago|reply
I share the feeling that we have to wait but there are some form factor complications that won't go away.

Full blown Linux applications need a keyboard. Even if they are reworked as touch friendly (I think GNOME is working on that, Canonical did) when the use cases swing toward typing a lot then we need a keyboard. There are foldable keyboards that fit into a pocket but the two of them start to become bulky. They probably belong to a bag and a bag could accommodate a tablet (10" screen) plus a keyboard of that size.

If one moves between multiple houses each one equipped with monitors and keyboard, it could be OK as a low power desktop replacement. I don't think I'm able to do my work on that though. Not enough RAM. It could be OK as an emergency device, but again, so is my tablet and my Bluetooth keyboard. BTW, my tablet runs Ubuntu 16.04 in a container (same kernel as Android.) Too bad Samsung discontinued Linux for Dex.

[+] usbqk|4 years ago|reply
With that hardware and software even $400 seems a complete rip-off.
[+] yjftsjthsd-h|4 years ago|reply
The CPU/RAM/storage seem roughly reasonable for that price? And in general, I'd say it's only a rip-off if its price is out of line with what it costs to make or maybe if it's out of line with anything compatible, in which case it's beating everything else by virtue of 99% of phones not having its features (kill switches, nearly-mainline kernel, non-Android distro support) and what phones do compete on features lose on price (Librem 5) or specs (non-pro Pinephone).
[+] pmontra|4 years ago|reply
Well yes but maybe it's not so expensive if I think about it as a small desktop (and with a touch screen!) that can fit in a pocket and can be carried over between places where I have everything I need to use it. Maybe it's not even so big anymore ("160.8 x 76.6 x 11.1 mm") and so heavy ("Approx. 215 g"). Those data are from the very bottom of https://www.pine64.org/pinephonepro/

If I think about it as a phone it's heavy like a stone (hopefully everybody agrees), too large (probably I'm almost alone on this one) and too expensive.

[+] seba_dos1|4 years ago|reply
It's actually a very good price - even considering that you don't really pay for software there.