top | item 30034781 (no title) Joky | 4 years ago Can you elaborate on the signed integer overflow and the implicit initialization differences you're referring to? discuss order hn newest GoblinSlayer|4 years ago https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#c... Joky|4 years ago But these are options, it's not a big deal to me that compiler offers special options for special use cases. It's not clear to me if you are saying that the *default* for clang and GCC differs, aren't they both using `fno-wrapv` by default? load replies (1)
GoblinSlayer|4 years ago https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#c... Joky|4 years ago But these are options, it's not a big deal to me that compiler offers special options for special use cases. It's not clear to me if you are saying that the *default* for clang and GCC differs, aren't they both using `fno-wrapv` by default? load replies (1)
Joky|4 years ago But these are options, it's not a big deal to me that compiler offers special options for special use cases. It's not clear to me if you are saying that the *default* for clang and GCC differs, aren't they both using `fno-wrapv` by default? load replies (1)
GoblinSlayer|4 years ago
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#c...
Joky|4 years ago