Would love some honest thoughts on whether it seems like there is something actually interesting here or not. (or tips on how to improve). My biggest "improvement" to date has been using canva to make half decent thumbnails haha
So you have several videos on mock interview questions, but instead of being able to skim the video titles and knowing which ones are that the word "mock interview" appears at a seemingly random place in the video's title.
Valid Parentheses (LC 20) Mock Interview - No Decision
VR Mock Interview- Nearly Sorted Array - Success
Coin Change - VR Mock Coding Interview - #3
Honestly the titling is just outright bad. I don't know what "LC 20" means and I didn't realize that "VR" was in reference to the animation style, and don't understand why that's important or relevant.
Putting: Success, No Decision, #3, etc in the title isn't clear what it is, or why I'd want to watch these where the candidate did NOT succeed. The whole format is just strange.
Bigger issue is I cannot read the handwriting in particular in this one:
I can't read anything written and it doesn't seem scripted making getting through it difficult.
Technical people want concise, easy to digest, easy to search (text! not video) reference materials. A combination of long form articles with white boarding videos that were clearer in both visuals and scripting would go a long way to adding value.
Why don’t you use a keyboard to type the text and make it actually readable?
The content might be interesting but the barrier to understand it seems unnecessarily high to the point I don’t want to invest time to figure out if it’s worth it or not.
danielgh7|4 years ago
Would love some honest thoughts on whether it seems like there is something actually interesting here or not. (or tips on how to improve). My biggest "improvement" to date has been using canva to make half decent thumbnails haha
Someone1234|4 years ago
Valid Parentheses (LC 20) Mock Interview - No Decision
VR Mock Interview- Nearly Sorted Array - Success
Coin Change - VR Mock Coding Interview - #3
Honestly the titling is just outright bad. I don't know what "LC 20" means and I didn't realize that "VR" was in reference to the animation style, and don't understand why that's important or relevant.
Putting: Success, No Decision, #3, etc in the title isn't clear what it is, or why I'd want to watch these where the candidate did NOT succeed. The whole format is just strange.
Bigger issue is I cannot read the handwriting in particular in this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OIq7G7w_30
sjcoles|4 years ago
Technical people want concise, easy to digest, easy to search (text! not video) reference materials. A combination of long form articles with white boarding videos that were clearer in both visuals and scripting would go a long way to adding value.
tucaz|4 years ago
The content might be interesting but the barrier to understand it seems unnecessarily high to the point I don’t want to invest time to figure out if it’s worth it or not.