top | item 30107133

Walking America: Washington, DC (Anacostia and Alexandria)

68 points| blegh | 4 years ago |intellectualinting.substack.com

38 comments

order
[+] ble|4 years ago|reply
As a native of the DC area familiar with one of these neighborhoods and living right next to the other, the author's descriptions are pleasantly familiar to me.

The author seems eager to fit the neighborhoods into his sociological and political analysis so some parts seem reductive but he's rather overt and honest about it. The author seems impressed with his social analysis and political opinions and I'm glad he has them but not sure how much I agree.

In my positive assessment, it doesn't hurt that I agree with some of his general sentiments: Anacostia is mostly homey and run-down, not brimming with menace; Crystal City is dominated by the offices of corporations and doesn't have much going for it, e.g.

[+] winternett|4 years ago|reply
Almost as if the writer is looking at a fish tank, it demonstrates how everyone is now in a constant state of isolated perspectives, and unable to walk in the shoes of others.

Whatever is normal for us defines our world. The constant underlying battle is that we're less and less capable of walking in the shoes of others. If you live in rural America, you'll realize the same blights and issues exist too. People go through trauma and tragedy, and they often simply give up, this world is harsh on people who give up, or use drugs, or resort to harmful behavior especially if they're financially and racially not able to overcome societal stereotypes that are promoted. Just as there are individuals using crack and heroin in the inner city, there are wealthy people in Hollywood doing exactly the same things. Society works so hard to define differences and then to rebrand them as case studies and perspectives, but no one talks about the human nature perspective because it's really uncomfortable for humans to examine their own individual faults in the process.

I've lived in DC for over 30 years, and seen every corner of it. I was born to middle-class priviledge, but I've also As a minority myself, I know how hard it can be at the bottom through not being intimidated of living inside of that "fish tank", and knowing from that experience that there are people born to, and suffering from, much worse situations than mine.

If we look at the ways out of poverty and desolation as a scientist, we're already failing because there is no really effective way of grouping individuals into any actionable case study. It's frickin everyone that is the issue now. The cure for ignorance is understanding how every last one of us is vulnerable, susceptible, and accountable for their individual perspectives and actions and self education about wealth inequality and racial insensitivity... world wide.

[+] jonstewart|4 years ago|reply
I’m one of the author’s “front row” people who lives in northwest DC (in Ward 1). He’s not inaccurate with his observations, but the article is also reductive, superficial, and exhibitionist. There are white upper middle class elites who live here for years inside a bubble, but the far more interesting and rewarding life here in the District is when you integrate more. That’s a story of DC that never gets told, unfortunately.
[+] rdtsc|4 years ago|reply
> An in your face “be saved or suffer” religiosity. One that deeply informs the lives and realities of the residents, in a way that makes elites uncomfortable

When government social services are ineffective or had broken down, the little churches in communities like that is often the only thing which keeps the community together. Family issues, an old person is sick and needs meals brought home, a place to meet.

Yeah it makes the people across the river pretty uncomfortable. They like to have their abstract model of a poor victim they support but that often doesn’t jive with reality. Most of them wouldn’t even dare walk through that neighborhood.

[+] ble|4 years ago|reply
> Yeah it makes the people across the river pretty uncomfortable. They like to have their abstract model of a poor victim they support but that often doesn’t jive with reality. Most of them wouldn’t even dare walk through that neighborhood.

Do you personally know people like this? It sounds like you're making some pretty broad generalizations and imagining (not wholly inaccurately!) how some people act and think.

[+] jonstewart|4 years ago|reply
Do you live here? Or are you just accepting your own bias and the author’s two days of walking around as all there is to know about DC?
[+] lambdaphagy|4 years ago|reply
At the risk of overinterpreting your comment, I think most religious people would be surprised to see their religion characterized as an ersatz government social service.
[+] havelhovel|4 years ago|reply
I think the author wants to read too much into a city having poor areas, wealthy areas, and suburbs. I also can’t help but think, based off the story they seem eager to tell, that they purposefully avoided taking a route that would have offered a better reflection of DC proper on the second day (such as starting from the NW), rather than walking past Reagan airport and pretending like they saw NOVA for what it is.
[+] ble|4 years ago|reply
While the author may draw some questionable or disputable conclusions, I think he is aware that different parts of the city and different parts of NoVA look very different; it seems like it's part of the point of going for a walk to make these observations.

Is there a reason that you think Northwest is a better reflection of "DC proper"? Anacostia and Benning are very much inside the city limits- they can't represent what most of Northwest is like and vice versa Northwest can't stand in for them.

[+] tbihl|4 years ago|reply
I found the article entirely consistent with Chris' usual fare. NW DC would have been a bizarre juxtaposition. Even the parts of DC he walked for this article stand out for how walkable they are compared to other maligned locales he has visited.
[+] exar0815|4 years ago|reply
I do not remember where I read it, but looking at it from the outside, I always have to think back on the quote: "Republicans don't like people who are different and want them to be somewhere else. Democrats don't like people who are different and want them to be someone else."
[+] netfl0|4 years ago|reply
Which is more humane?
[+] CPLX|4 years ago|reply
It’s interesting to see this article standing on its own. I don’t think it makes a lot of sense this way. It’s from his newsletter and it kind of assumes a lot and is more of an impressionistic sketch for people that already share his worldview.

If you don’t already share that point of view and haven’t read his book this will seem superficial and lacking nuance.

With that said I highly recommend his book, Dignity, which is a much longer and fleshed out discussion of how our society treats people and places that don’t matter.

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/566661/dignity-by-c...

[+] ble|4 years ago|reply
Thank you for this context! I left the article curious to better understand the author's particular frame.
[+] vbtemp|4 years ago|reply
I read this with the same pleasure one would read a well-written short story. The author's English teacher would have given him an A.

However, no one should confuse this with actually being some kind of analysis. This piece is entertainment to be enjoyed by white folks in Alexandria cozy on their couch with their cafe-au-lait.

Source: Decades-long resident of DC who walks and bikes those routes every month.

[+] snowgrove|4 years ago|reply
>This piece is entertainment to be enjoyed by white folks in Alexandria cozy on their couch with their cafe-au-lait.

Or the Asian and Indian folks who increasingly make up NoVA’s “front row” communities. Source: growing up in Alexandria and living there for a decade.

There are elements of truth to the author’s racial generalizations, but one defining aspect of NoVA and DC is how different groups and races intermix (my middle school was more than 50% black and Hispanic, my high school more than 50% Asian). This aspect is entirely absent from the author’s just-so analysis.

[+] moron4hire|4 years ago|reply
The only uptight, hall-monitor-like people I know here in Alexandria are the few Republicans who have a chip on their shoulder about being Republican. Maybe taking a single walk through a town doesn't give one the insight one thinks it does.
[+] ble|4 years ago|reply
I hope the piece wasn't a total turn-off for you. "Uptight" is a subjective judgment and a comparative judgment but I think the author is hitting on something real - though different people might perceive or phrase it in different ways.

Do you think Alexandria might feel uptight compared to Anacostia and Benning Road? The author is partly expressing a comparative judgment - that's kind of the point, going for a walk in a much poorer black neighborhood vs strolling past the perimeter of Old Town Alexandria.

One expression of what I might call "uptightness" that you might hear from DC area residents is an overt fear of even driving through certain DC neighborhoods (or maybe even Southeast as a whole!), as if they were active war zones and not just a place where the signs of low social maintenance and low-income lives of black people are unmistakably visible. It makes sense, the crime stats are worse; most people have no reason to visit these neighborhoods and see what they're like; everyone has heard stories about how bad DC was decades ago and these neighborhoods hold the bad reputation.

In my opinion, people being "uptight" in this way is a mix of "common sense" (maybe it doesn't reflect reality, but if people act like it does they really pay no price) and "hysteria" (other people told me I ought to be extremely afraid, so I will be). [scare quotes added to emphasize that these are my subjective judgments and, imo, inescapably subjective.]

[+] ble|4 years ago|reply
people who are the opposite of uptight are usually okay with unimportant disagreements, like letting other people be wrong in their harmless opinions.
[+] sulam|4 years ago|reply
It’s funny to me that in the neighborhood he professes he was most worried about being preached at, likely no one interacted with him, and of course he was actually preached at in the other neighborhood. (I say likely, because he didn’t note any interactions, but I wonder if there were counter-narrative interactions that didn’t make it past the story filter. For instance I’m sure every one of those fair trade eco friendly shops has people working there trying to make ends meet and happy they have a job, just like at Denny’s.)
[+] xvedejas|4 years ago|reply
I find it interesting how many neighborhoods all across America I hear described as "just-beginning-to-gentrify". The neighborhood I live in has been described as that for thirty years now. Depending on who you ask, it's either entirely gentrified at this point, or it's one of the last holdouts yet to be affected.
[+] info781|4 years ago|reply
DC is a fantastic place to walk, especially in the spring and fall. I lived in a crystal city apartment for a year , it has a fun restaurant area on 23rd. Amazon is setting up there, it has subway and train access. They are building a pedestrian walkway to the airport, it has a great future. You are a mile from the airport but not much noise as they come over the river.
[+] and0|4 years ago|reply
He walked within a hundred feet of my old apartment so I'll happily use my local card to call absolute gibberish on this entire thing. I really have no idea what he was babbling about or why he's so confident in that weird reductive lens he views through.
[+] tbihl|4 years ago|reply
Which part was contrary to your local experience?