Sigfox Is in Financial Trouble

[throwaway81523]

Should any of us be upset over this? They made an annoyingly proprietary protocol that would be much more useful if it was open.

[Knemejic]

When comparing Sigfox to LoRa, they are not even that bad in terms of openness: The Sigfox protocol specifications are public: https://build.sigfox.com/sigfox-device-radio-specifications This is in contrast to LoRa, which remains a closed protocol (I am not talking about LoRaWAN, that part of the spec is open, but LoRa, i.e. the physical layer stuff). So there really is a tradeoff here: If you want an open wireless protocol compatible with many standard RF transceivers, but a proprietary backend and device library, go for Sigfox. If you want a closed, proprietary wireless protocol that only works with Semtech chips, but an open backend, go for LoRa/LoRaWAN.