So they don't own @Quikster .... and they don't own quickster.com (the likely typo that their users are going to make). Even if you accept their premise that it's the right move from a business standpoint, they're dropping the ball on ensuring their customers don't get lost in the transition.
Even worse to me, they don't own @Qwikster and looking at the timeline of the person who has it now is just... scary.
This seems like an all around PR nightmare. Regardless of whether or not the name is terrible, why wouldn't they shore up their name on major social media players before making the announcement? Were they worried if they did this word may leak?
I have the feeling that they're trying to separate both companies completely in the long run. The DVD by mail business is ultimately doomed. Why use DVD by mail services when you can directly stream movies?
Granted, Qwikster will still stay around for a while, but I have no doubt that it will slowly die, just like Blockbuster right now.
Is this what extremely good organic SEO looks like?
Most of the other names are not really used on the Internet at all. Now, when anyone fails to spell qwikster, they're going to find this article. It seems like they rank for every misspelled query now.
(Google may start spell correcting to qwikster, though for the moment they seem to spell correct to quickstar when they do.)
Any time I've heard about them(outside of friends who were suckered into their schemes try loop me in as well) it's all been through sites that have complained about how bad they suck. I'm surprised they're still around.
Netflix is well known for its amazing delivery system, and this new name emphasizes that - not what product is being delivered at all. I think Qwikster will be expanding into shipment of all sorts of non DVD movie type things. They are already going to be doing video games.
That said, yes Qwikster sounds stupid. But the same could be said for such words as Google, iPad, etc.
[+] [-] uptown|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kristofferR|14 years ago|reply
http://blog.sfgate.com/techchron/2011/09/19/netflix-ceo-i-me...
[+] [-] shakes|14 years ago|reply
This seems like an all around PR nightmare. Regardless of whether or not the name is terrible, why wouldn't they shore up their name on major social media players before making the announcement? Were they worried if they did this word may leak?
[+] [-] hollerith|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phoboslab|14 years ago|reply
Granted, Qwikster will still stay around for a while, but I have no doubt that it will slowly die, just like Blockbuster right now.
[+] [-] robert_nsu|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] perezda|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 0x12|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] socratic|14 years ago|reply
Most of the other names are not really used on the Internet at all. Now, when anyone fails to spell qwikster, they're going to find this article. It seems like they rank for every misspelled query now.
(Google may start spell correcting to qwikster, though for the moment they seem to spell correct to quickstar when they do.)
Are there other variants of this technique?
[+] [-] ryan42|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] artmageddon|14 years ago|reply
Any time I've heard about them(outside of friends who were suckered into their schemes try loop me in as well) it's all been through sites that have complained about how bad they suck. I'm surprised they're still around.
[+] [-] cjdavis|14 years ago|reply
That said, yes Qwikster sounds stupid. But the same could be said for such words as Google, iPad, etc.
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] nhangen|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Roboprog|14 years ago|reply