(no title)
sobani | 4 years ago
> implying a cost of $377,000 per job saved
The second doesn't follow from the first at all?
The fact that employment increased doesn't tell you anything about how many jobs were not lost, right?
sobani | 4 years ago
> implying a cost of $377,000 per job saved
The second doesn't follow from the first at all?
The fact that employment increased doesn't tell you anything about how many jobs were not lost, right?
No comments yet.