top | item 30188292

(no title)

rawtxapp | 4 years ago

That's very "pigeonholey" way of looking at things though, no? Just because you're good at something doesn't mean you can't become good at something else too. If you're super knowledgeable about very technical things, learning other hard sciences is feasible as well given enough time.

At the end of the day, if you create anything that's worthless, it will be worthless independent of whether you're an insider or outsider.

discuss

order

lottin|4 years ago

The argument isn't that they couldn't become knowledgeable in finance and economics, if they invested enough time and effort, but that they aren't, because they haven't, because they think that their expertise in one area makes them automatically experts in other areas. This is pretty accurate in my experience.

RC_ITR|4 years ago

I think GP’s underlying point (besides paraphrasing a popular YouTube video) is that for good reason, society elevated “computer engineers” because the work they did (e.g., build Google) was very impactful and value-creative.

A bunch of computer engineers are now burning through that good will in a misguided attempt to accumulate personal wealth.

manquer|4 years ago

Good will built when building Google (and others from that era) is already burnt by Google (and others ) of today. You rarely here positive stories about tech in general media these days compared to say 00's.