(no title)
ntSean | 4 years ago
Learning platforms such as Duolingo, Brilliant, or Khan Academy very infrequently give you a wall of text to parse. This suggests, that it isn’t a necessity or preferable for comprehension.
So to me, this feels silly. As if someone is complaining that a bike hurts your ability to leisurely move at a walking pace through a park.
Why was there an expectation that it would be more ideal?
Use tools are that are appropriate for the context.
For long form text, use a context that allows you to consume slowly, whether than be an e-book or hard copy.
dorchadas|4 years ago
Or, it shows that they're trying to get people to stay around and use them more. I actually really doubt Duolingo produces anyone who has true comprehension in reading a passage of text simply because it only ever asks you to translate one-off sentences (and rarely at that, it only has you click words if you're on the app!). I don't think they're optimizing for comprehension and understanding as much as they're optimizing for user engagement.
ntSean|4 years ago
This pathway has been effective for me, I've been doing Duo for a few months now! Which leaves me lost in your premise of "true comprehension"?
But maybe that would mean this conversion is about semantics rather than us having a "true conversation"
toyg|4 years ago
No, that suggests that those platforms understand the limitations of the medium and try to work around them - with mixed results. They still have to use a modicum of text, they just build other stuff around it to reinforce meaning.
Your critique would be valid if these platforms were not using any text whatsoever - which might well happen at some point, in the distant future, but definitely is not the case now.
ntSean|4 years ago
Must have been because I read this comment from my mobile device. Time to get the printer going ;)