top | item 30215229

(no title)

GhettoComputers | 4 years ago

Does anyone else get confused by "apps" and "executables"? This one uses the term "Windows Apps" for ".exe" files, I wondered why anyone would want to run a Windows App https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/apps/windows

I don't understand how its better than VM, it says run them like they're native, but its separate windows for single applications, I thought it would use something like WINE.

It should be called "A Windows VM for executables in Linux with native windowing" unless I didn't understand it.

discuss

order

p_j_w|4 years ago

The word "app" has changed in common usage. Most any program you ran on your computer was called an Application way back when, but now it's come to mean... whatever it's supposed to mean now. Whoever wrote the Github site is probably old like me and is using the old vocabulary.

FpUser|4 years ago

I am an old fart but I am starting to use "app" for windows executables as this is what many of my clients "understand" better.

weikju|4 years ago

Before Apple's App Store popularized a specific meaning of "app", "app" was shorthand for "application", which perfectly fits a .exe file and any number of executable files/formats.

jimmygrapes|4 years ago

I struggled with this a lot because of experience with Java applets which implied they were "small apps" which implied "app" meant something... and it did; it meant application, which meant program, which meant, I think, something along the lines of "mostly self contained system to accept user input, compute said input, and return a user-friendly result" to oversimplify.

For a long time I boycotted the term "app" once Apple et al. used it as their term for what I considered "programs" and now I'm just done with caring.

App = program = executable = distinct set of actions triggered by user or automated input = interface

shaicoleman|4 years ago

I had to shorten it to apps to fit the title length limit