[ohyeshedid]

> The implication is "To hold oneself to a better standard, make actionable and/or substantiated statements, especially when making critical statements."

Ok, but defining the implications of 1st party statements to 3rd parties is tricksy business.

> People seem to shit on Mozilla/Firefox often, and often without any evidence or useful data to work with. And they often say they use Chrome instead, run by an organization that those same people would probably say is user-hostile.

Except ravenstine didn't do any of that, so you're applying your issues with other people to the wrong conversation. They responded with depth before you posted this.

> It's like seeing people criticize corruption in Western democratic governments and declaring they're avoiding that mess by moving to Moscow.

You sure you're in the same conversation as everyone else?