Do you have examples of what in OpenBSD you found "utterly complicated to setup and use"? I've been using for several years now because of how devoid of complexity it is and because of how comprehensive the documentation is. Trying to even install other Unices nowadays frustrates me to no end because they're more complicated than "just keep pressing enter".
implements|4 years ago
Another example might be when startx stopped working for non-root users - a "change / why / what to do now" explanation would have been handy.
But OpenBSD isn't aimed at Unix newbies so it's entirely understandable why that level of hand-holding doesn't exist.
mrweasel|4 years ago
aspyct|4 years ago
Also, I installed Kubuntu the other day, and I just kept pressing enter.
There was even a checkbox for FDE.
peatmoss|4 years ago
OpenBSD's approach appeals to me aesthetically, and I like the feeling that I could easily dive in and get to the bottom of the stack. There is no magic.
By contrast, I look at Ubuntu as a hot mess of code that I'll never understand, while simultaneously appreciating that I can click through the installer after a cocktail or two and be playing games on Steam in short order.
messe|4 years ago
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#softraidFDE
Granted it could probably be added to the installer, but that's hardly "Utterly complicated to setup".