[throwaway32]

when something is specifically promoted as protection against oppressive laws/regulations, and then caves at the first opportunity to do so, that's problematic. The service clearly never intended to fight such orders, only to use such claims as marketing tools. I dont care if he is a "guy just like me" thats a scummy, shitty thing to do.

[randomaccount4]

I'm not really going to argue, I guess it's a matter of opinion. I don't feel that the service is particularly positioned in the way that it's promoted to fight oppressive law - based on the landing page anyway; I'm unaware of his other marketing initiatives though, afaik, he uses word of mouth. I guess that's really all I can say.