(no title)
euske
|
4 years ago
I'm curious of the eventual consequence of emoji development. Early Chinese characters were pretty much like pictograms. They have developed into a highly sophisticated abstract language / writing system, but its emoji-like aspects still remain today. The major shortcoming of today's emojis is that they are too hardware dependent and not hand-writable. It's interesting that the world is basically reinventing the same thing a few millenniums later.
s3tz|4 years ago
It's a bit like doing this:
"It was a very sunny day." <- regular sentence
"It was a very [sun emoji] day." <- same thing
"It was a very sunny day. [happy face emoji]" <- v3 pictos that (implicitly?) communicate extra context
"It was a very sunny day. [高兴]" <- same thing, but v1 pictos
wongarsu|4 years ago
"It was a very sunny day :)"
"It was a very sunny day :\"
"It was a very sunny day ;)"
Some web forums started replacing them with images which lead to designers inventing more emojis, and due to Japanese carriers wanting the same for SMS those got incorporated in character encodings.
What seems strange to me is that most emoji that exist are completely useless for the purpose of conveying emotion, or encoding any useful information that can't be expressed in a word. It's like some designer had to fulfill a quota or someone wanted to just "have more emojis". Yet the most popular emojis are clearly still used to convey emotion [1].
1: https://emojipedia.org/stats/
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]
watwut|4 years ago
That is major advantage if that would prevent adoption as replacement for alphabet.
tdeck|4 years ago
http://www.iconji.com/
teddyh|4 years ago
teddyh|4 years ago
pinephoneguy|4 years ago