top | item 30356087

(no title)

J253 | 4 years ago

To prevent some of the issues with blurring or compression leaking sensitive info, one simple workaround I’ve used is to just put black boxes over the text as usual in any program and then take a screenshot and save it out from there. No accidental history or compression leaking.

discuss

order

addaon|4 years ago

One thing that still leaks is the exact spacing between words adjacent to the black boxes. This is a particular concern one only one or two words are blacked out -- for example a name. With a known font (with known character widths and kerning tables) and a known text engine applying those kerning rules, there's often very few combinations of letters that give the exact pixel (or subpixel) width blank space.

lelandfe|4 years ago

Clever. Monospaced fonts improve things, with the tradeoff of making it trivial to know the number of characters redacted.

8note|4 years ago

For a first name + last name combination, you still have a lot of potential combinations based on the total length

toomanydoubts|4 years ago

Has someone made a demo of that?

bobsmooth|4 years ago

So blurring can be reversed and black bars can be cracked, is there any way to securely redact a document?

Gigachad|4 years ago

Tbh I think there needs to be some dedicated tool for censoring images. Even with this method there is a small chance that it isn’t 100% opaque. I have seen several images where you can pull them in to gimp and adjust the color levels until even the slightest color difference becomes blown out and you can read the censored text.

It’s just too easy to mess this stuff up.

8note|4 years ago

Windows paint does pretty well, though it's still error prone

anamexis|4 years ago

That would be a cool idea for a really simple and easily auditable FOSS image tool.