Reminds me of the quote The Joker had in The Dark Knight:
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."
I love programming. I do it during the day, at night, on the weekends, all the time. I do some things for money, some things for free, and some things that no one will ever see just because it's fun.
I realize that this job is actually paid, but I don't like the thought that people who require payment for programming someone else's idea are just "doing it for the money".
On the contrary, anyone who still believes in a bs that staying wake an insane amount of time is a way of getting things done, should educate himself on how his body & brain actually works, or at least go through "Hammock-Driven Development".
> still believes in a bs that staying wake an insane amount of time is a way of getting things done.
You missed the part where he says getting things done at high quality. I agree with you, but think things can be get done in a half-assed way, by staying awake. But ultimately will need to be reworked multiple times the hours you stayed up.
I'd love to see the caliber of people joining this.
I'm sure some people have applied. Some with some deception in their heart. None the less, interesting.
I have my own 112,347 projects to finish.
I would have hoped he would have been clear about the idea/business/challenge/work and more transparent about the ownership/revenue/raised funds.
And coders that accept no salary for coding, except for close friends or family seem dubious.
You will less likely get someone who cares your dream as much as you do.
What I realized/found these days is that the most passionate people that love to work on startup ideas tend to have their own strong opinions on how things should be done.
This creates a little bit of a management issue. Discussions tend to be filled with using esoteric technology or the "would it be cool if" or the "that's sucks, I could do better in 1 day" as opposed to focus on delivering the stable, high quality, 85% UI polished, version 1.0 of the product.
It's a miracle if some people can get it to look 50% complete. For some reason, and by magic, the UI incrementally degrades given the number of days in the hands of certain engineers. I'm not saying that everyone is like that, but I'm pretty certain that if some engineers approached following driving directions the same way they follow the UI, they'd be permanently lost with no hope of return. 85%. Sheesh.
By filtering out the people who 'only do it for money', he has also inadvertently filtered out all the people who know that the way business show they value their employees is to pay them appropriately.
I honestly think he screwed up by hedging his play in the end. If he decides to go down that path he should say something like "dont worry, you'll get paid" on a first contact email or even during an interview only. He started with something that could have been bold but in the end looked like windows 8: look we have this super cool new interface totally redogned from ground up (but dont worry we still have all the bloatware somewhere in there)
The intersection of stimulating-to-develop-projects with those that people will pay money for is quite large. However, the intersection of liberating-and-enjoyable-life-opportunities with i-don't-have-any-money are not that large.
I wonder if this "entrepreneur" also isn't getting paid. This is the classic bad business proposition - i.e. I won't pay you now but I might at some unspecified point in future.
> Me? I've got that illness. I'm not a engineer, I'm an entrepreneur.
There are plenty of business opportunities that require little if any code to be written that could be addressed by anyone who has the entrepreneur bug. It's hard work, rarely generating sexy IPO-level returns or media exposure, dealing with cutthroat competitors, regulators, clients and employees and an apathetic market. But like I said, it's hard work.
Why someone would still believe today that they can magically make a business succeed in a space where they ignore even the most fundamental concepts is beyond me. More often than not these projects tend to be very simplistic and rely not on the technology but on the social dynamic of the concept (see: Kickstarter) and if the hiring non-technical founder is unable to hire from within their social circle then it's quite possible that either any developer they know would pass on this or they don't actually know any developers.
And why is this person choosing development languages/stacks, or did they cross post to every language job site?
[+] [-] flyosity|14 years ago|reply
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."
I love programming. I do it during the day, at night, on the weekends, all the time. I do some things for money, some things for free, and some things that no one will ever see just because it's fun.
I realize that this job is actually paid, but I don't like the thought that people who require payment for programming someone else's idea are just "doing it for the money".
[+] [-] kunley|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aangjie|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] crdoconnor|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] freddealmeida|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] freddealmeida|14 years ago|reply
I have my own 112,347 projects to finish.
I would have hoped he would have been clear about the idea/business/challenge/work and more transparent about the ownership/revenue/raised funds.
And coders that accept no salary for coding, except for close friends or family seem dubious.
[+] [-] hello_moto|14 years ago|reply
What I realized/found these days is that the most passionate people that love to work on startup ideas tend to have their own strong opinions on how things should be done.
This creates a little bit of a management issue. Discussions tend to be filled with using esoteric technology or the "would it be cool if" or the "that's sucks, I could do better in 1 day" as opposed to focus on delivering the stable, high quality, 85% UI polished, version 1.0 of the product.
[+] [-] jsavimbi|14 years ago|reply
It's a miracle if some people can get it to look 50% complete. For some reason, and by magic, the UI incrementally degrades given the number of days in the hands of certain engineers. I'm not saying that everyone is like that, but I'm pretty certain that if some engineers approached following driving directions the same way they follow the UI, they'd be permanently lost with no hope of return. 85%. Sheesh.
[+] [-] wccrawford|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] crdoconnor|14 years ago|reply
This is what turned me off the most, actually.
[+] [-] zobzu|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dfxm12|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DallaRosa|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] euroclydon|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] motters|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nuxi|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] idiot|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] democracy|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jsavimbi|14 years ago|reply
There are plenty of business opportunities that require little if any code to be written that could be addressed by anyone who has the entrepreneur bug. It's hard work, rarely generating sexy IPO-level returns or media exposure, dealing with cutthroat competitors, regulators, clients and employees and an apathetic market. But like I said, it's hard work.
Why someone would still believe today that they can magically make a business succeed in a space where they ignore even the most fundamental concepts is beyond me. More often than not these projects tend to be very simplistic and rely not on the technology but on the social dynamic of the concept (see: Kickstarter) and if the hiring non-technical founder is unable to hire from within their social circle then it's quite possible that either any developer they know would pass on this or they don't actually know any developers.
And why is this person choosing development languages/stacks, or did they cross post to every language job site?