HP is buying Autonomy for 10+B. Many analysts feel this is over priced, and on Oracle's earnings call Larry Ellison couldn't help but get a jab in at HP by saying that they (Mark Hurd ironically) told Autonomy they were overpriced at their current 6+B Market Cap when Autonomy went to Oracle looking for a suitor.
Autonomy CEO then said "WTF we never talked to Oracle about being purchased".
I forget where, but I once read an article suggesting that one of the big problems Microsoft has faced in the past 10 years is that, after the DoJ suit and the ruling of it as an abusive monopoly by Judge Jackson, they missed out on a lot of good new developers simply because they didn't want to work for that sort of company.
I don't think my opinions of Larry Ellison had been high for some time, but recent actions and publishing this sort of press release hardly raises them. Perhaps this will be the final downfall of Oracle; that their reputation in the tech community so precedes them that they run out of willing labour and / or partners?
While I agree with your general assessment I disagree with your conclusion.
See, Oracle is not (and never was) a technology company. They are a huge marketing and sales organisation that happens to dabble in technology products.
The carnage of Sun top engineers after the takeover should tell us something.
That said, I think it's a dumb, childish and immature move.
2 Minutes of LOL and gufaw! As a believer in kharma (in the metaphorical sense) I think that will come back and bite.Messrs. Hurd and Ellison.
Do you really think Larry cares about what some uppity yankee hipster thinks about his company? These days, a lot (most?) of Oracle software is built in India, Eastern Europe, etc. Developers in those countries don't care about this sort of things, they care about the cold hard cash Oracle have in their coffers, which they get by selling products over geeks' heads (i.e. to their bosses' boss).
Wage inflation in developing countries is much more of a problem for Larry than "boardroom etiquette".
Agreed.
This is a really weird press release for Oracle to serve from their flagship website. Even the Notch v Bethesda back & forth was orders of magnitude more civil…
What about this? (not a joke)
A) ridicule HP into dropping Autonomy bid
B) because of A, the stock price of Autonomy crashes
C) Oracle buys Autonomy
D) Mike Lynch gets fired
If only Mr. Lynch had just come out and said, "yes, we also went to Oracle to see if they might be interested". Then he would have had much less trouble =)
Why does Oracle care so much about this? Autonomy shopped themselves around and Oracle turned them down. Now Oracle wants to hurt Autonomy because a competitor bought them. I guess all is fair in M&A, but this just seems like a stupid spat.
I'm guessing it's mostly Mark Hurd (Oracle president and ex-HP CEO) trying to look good by pointing out that he did refuse to buy Autonomy because the price he was discussing with them was overpriced in his opinion whereas HP bought them for almost twice the price.
It's basically Mark Hurd getting back at HP in the most pathetic way I've ever seen.
I find it ridiculous that companies operating at this level waste their time with things like this when they clearly have bigger issues on their hands. No wonder Oracle is struggling if this is where they are focused.
[+] [-] mikeryan|14 years ago|reply
HP is buying Autonomy for 10+B. Many analysts feel this is over priced, and on Oracle's earnings call Larry Ellison couldn't help but get a jab in at HP by saying that they (Mark Hurd ironically) told Autonomy they were overpriced at their current 6+B Market Cap when Autonomy went to Oracle looking for a suitor.
Autonomy CEO then said "WTF we never talked to Oracle about being purchased".
Then this.
[+] [-] smoyer|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] darksaga|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eftpotrm|14 years ago|reply
I don't think my opinions of Larry Ellison had been high for some time, but recent actions and publishing this sort of press release hardly raises them. Perhaps this will be the final downfall of Oracle; that their reputation in the tech community so precedes them that they run out of willing labour and / or partners?
[+] [-] CaptainZapp|14 years ago|reply
See, Oracle is not (and never was) a technology company. They are a huge marketing and sales organisation that happens to dabble in technology products.
The carnage of Sun top engineers after the takeover should tell us something.
That said, I think it's a dumb, childish and immature move.
2 Minutes of LOL and gufaw! As a believer in kharma (in the metaphorical sense) I think that will come back and bite.Messrs. Hurd and Ellison.
[+] [-] toyg|14 years ago|reply
Wage inflation in developing countries is much more of a problem for Larry than "boardroom etiquette".
[+] [-] DrJokepu|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tptacek|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 5hoom|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] forgotAgain|14 years ago|reply
A) ridicule HP into dropping Autonomy bid
B) because of A the stock price of HP drops significantly
C) Oracle buys HP
D) Mark Hurd gets his HP executive washroom key back.
[+] [-] toyg|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spinchange|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rbanffy|14 years ago|reply
I don't think Oracle would do anything to benefit HP
[+] [-] phillmv|14 years ago|reply
It's professionally put together, but if I someone tried to use these as slides during a presentation I'd want to tear my eyes out.
[+] [-] bennylope|14 years ago|reply
This does not stop consultants from presenting such decks. And yes, those presentations will make you want to tear your eyes out.
[+] [-] haasted|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] X-Istence|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] marcf|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] reefab|14 years ago|reply
It's basically Mark Hurd getting back at HP in the most pathetic way I've ever seen.
[+] [-] itswindy|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] headbiznatch|14 years ago|reply
"Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) is the world's most complete, open, and integrated business software and hardware systems company."
Put it on every release, it will become true? Or something?
[+] [-] MaysonL|14 years ago|reply
See: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/sep/29/autonomy-orac...
Slides prepared by Qatalyst in January, meeting between Autonomy and Hurd as an introduction, not a sales pitch.
[+] [-] j_col|14 years ago|reply
> Mr. Lynch then accused of Oracle of being ‘inaccurate’. Either Mr. Lynch has a very poor memory or he’s lying.
Wow, things are really getting dirty between Oracle, HP, and Autonomy. Wonder will this affect HP's embattled share price further?
[+] [-] tybris|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] protomyth|14 years ago|reply
It is pretty interesting to me that during the SPARC SuperCluster event, Ellison did not mention HP, but instead focussed heavily on IBM's server.
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] goodweeds|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] loglog1234|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] freejack|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amac|14 years ago|reply