And cost could likely be mitigated by NOT using LEGO, which is a buzzword that makes the article, and rather opting in for literally anything else: like Meccano if it has to be a toy.
"Of course, the microscope doesn’t have to be made out of LEGO — it’s possible to 3D print all the components or mill them. But those approaches take a lot more time, and it would be tricky for people to do it at home. Another advantage of LEGO, Temiz says, is that the bricks are very precise and easily obtainable. And it’s possible to modify the structure by simply replacing a piece with a different one or assemble the microscope in a completely different way to take cross-section images, for example."
notum|4 years ago
Stay tuned for my $2000 Cheetos(R) four axis CNC.
Luc|4 years ago
lancewiggs|4 years ago
justinc8687|4 years ago
Arcanum-XIII|4 years ago