(no title)
maldeh | 4 years ago
> Security Standards. Okta's ISMP includes adherance to and regular testing of the key controls, systems and procedures of its ISMP to validate that they are properly implemented and effective in addressing the threats and risks identified. Such testing includes:
> a) Internal risk assessments;
> b) ISO 27001, 27002, 27017 and 27018 certifications;
> c) NIST guidance; and
> d) SOC2 Type II (or successor standard) audits annually performed by accredited third-party auditors ("Audit Report").
I don't think storing AWS keys within Slack would comply to any of these standards?
hughrr|4 years ago
They are not effective security controls and never will be and should never be a measure of that.
dvtrn|4 years ago
I’ve also been closely monitoring the responses from our CTO and VP of Security when someone from our DevOps team posted a link to the Verge article in slack this morning.
Which brings me to this inquiry: How are your orgs responding to this? We have a dependency on an Okta-like provider and my first thought when reading this news was “you know, wonder if we should give our shit a sanity check”, and someone beat me to this, proposed it in slack but the idea was turned down by our SecOps team.
disillusioned|4 years ago
(Upon further review, it appears to be the more UK way of saying it! Ha!)
stefan_|4 years ago
Spooky23|4 years ago
I’d look at stuff like FedRAMP as a starting point for the control environment and explore further.
api|4 years ago
The decision makers have absolutely no idea how any of this stuff works.