top | item 30809871

(no title)

trendoid | 3 years ago

Find (or create) lots of obese people or smokers or alcoholics focusing only on hand strength exercises. Then see how their life expectancy changes compared to obese people, smokers or alcoholics that didn't do those hand strength exercises.

discuss

order

deltaonefour|3 years ago

>Find (or create) lots of obese people or smokers or alcoholics focusing only on hand strength exercises.

It's clear you don't see it. You don't have to focus on smokers or alcoholics that's irrelevant.

But let's modify your statement to not include the fluff.

>Find (or create) lots of people who focus only on hand strength exercises.

Even when you remove the fluff the statement above still shows how you don't understand the dichotomy between correlation and causation. The experiment in the article can in fact be summarized by this statement:

>Find lots of people who focus only on hand strength exercises.

This statement cannot prove hand strength causes longer lifespan, you are right. However to test for causality is trivial. you simply need to do do this:

>(Create) lots of people who focus only on hand strength exercises.

It is the act of creation that forms the causative proof. Think about it.

If I took a random population and made them train for grip strength. Then I compared that groups lifespan to the overall lifespan of people I didn't make train for grip strength and I find that there is a correlation with longer life span for people who trained for grip strength...

Well I've just verified causation. There is literally no other conclusion. Try to come up with a scenario where the two factors are not connected causally. You can't.

By having the experimenters hand controlling the causative factor, you can prove correlation. If you are simply observing things with no control over experimental parameters, correlation is then impossible to verify.

It is the act of creation or controlling the experiment that allows for causation to be verified.

trendoid|3 years ago

> If I took a random population and made them train for grip strength. Then I compared that groups lifespan to the overall lifespan of people I didn't make train for grip strength and I find that there is a correlation with longer life span for people who trained for grip strength... Well I've just verified causation. There is literally no other conclusion.

What if the people you trained for grip strength also started taking care of their health in general (eg. eating better and moving more often), after starting your grip strengthening exercises?