top | item 30849189

(no title)

taylortrusty | 3 years ago

Honest question: what's wrong with any of these examples?

discuss

order

CogitoCogito|3 years ago

Just to take the bank example: the bank should block any attempts to remove money from the account once it goes negative and then put a hold on it until the owner contacts them. Charging negative and continuously charging fees should just be illegal.

diordiderot|3 years ago

But all the money they lose on administration expenses! /s

Zak|3 years ago

It's probably wrong for landlords to be able to hold suing a previous landlord and winning against a prospective tenant. The winning part implies the tenant was correct and asserted their rights.

Of course, tenants being afraid to assert their rights is in the unethical self-interest of a landlord. A society that's attempting to be just should not want that.

voakbasda|3 years ago

Winning or losing in court has very little to do with being right or wrong.