I'm fairly new to blogging but I thought I should just start writing. Please let me know what you think. If you liked this article, you may like the previous.
I think it's not a bad article, especially for someone new to blogging. You don't claim to have all the answers, and that's okay. The article was a good length, and well presented, without any unnecessary JavaScript or adverts.
> On the other hand there is more permanency than previously on Web 2.0.
Is that necessarily the case with Web 3.0? Certainly any data stored on-chain is likely to be more permanent, in practice, than in current architectures, but the on-chain data might just be a hash, or possibly even a zero knowledge proof.
> These systems enable anyone to host a node in the network and participate the in decentralization.
Please don't buy into the idea that you can write a worthwhile blog post about 'Web3' by telling us how confused you are. If that was my blog post I'd delete it.
(Simply by using the term 'Web3' in sequence with 'Web 2.0' and ignoring that the W3C was using the term 'Web 3.0' 10 years ago shows that you haven't been paying attention and don't have an informed opinion to share. Alternately you're qualified to be the annoying salesperson who points out the 'confusion' of anybody who walks into an audiophile store... Except for the fact that nobody has walked into an audiophile store for 20 years because we don't want to see that salesperson.)
washedDeveloper|3 years ago
dane-pgp|3 years ago
> On the other hand there is more permanency than previously on Web 2.0.
Is that necessarily the case with Web 3.0? Certainly any data stored on-chain is likely to be more permanent, in practice, than in current architectures, but the on-chain data might just be a hash, or possibly even a zero knowledge proof.
> These systems enable anyone to host a node in the network and participate the in decentralization.
You might want to fix that typo.
PaulHoule|3 years ago
(Simply by using the term 'Web3' in sequence with 'Web 2.0' and ignoring that the W3C was using the term 'Web 3.0' 10 years ago shows that you haven't been paying attention and don't have an informed opinion to share. Alternately you're qualified to be the annoying salesperson who points out the 'confusion' of anybody who walks into an audiophile store... Except for the fact that nobody has walked into an audiophile store for 20 years because we don't want to see that salesperson.)