(no title)
daviross | 3 years ago
It's all signaling & identification, so if you don't want people seeing a Thin Blue Line flag & going "maybe that's not somewhere I want to be", talk with the thin-blue-line people & get them to stop doing the things that make some people want to avoid them.
whimsicalism|3 years ago
Eh, don't really like this concept as a general principle. 'Pattern-matching' can often just be discrimination.
FWIW, I think it is fine to make inferences based on what flags people are flying and avoid overly patriotic people.
silicon2401|3 years ago
> if you don't want people seeing a predominantly black neighborhood & going "maybe that's not somewhere I want to be", talk with the people living in black neighborhoods & get them to stop doing the things that make some people want to avoid them.
Do you still think there's nothing wrong with prejudice, or in your words, pattern-matching?
Spivak|3 years ago
I don’t know what the right way to address this because it’s become extremely common to not organize under explicit banners but instead make your membership known by not subtle dog whistles to maintain, again, not subtle plausible deniability. Like everyone does it! I could fill your screen with just the liberal/left/blue whistles I know about. This will always suck for the people who aren’t announcing their membership but the alternative is being ignorant to the groups de facto organizing.
daviross|3 years ago
And besides, I specified 'signaling & identification'. I may have missed where people were being born with thin-blue-line flags as birthmarks.
On the other hand, maybe you've got a point. I should be able to walk into any gun shop in the country with a "John Brown was justified, Sherman didn't go far enough" t-shirt & not see so much as a dirty look.