top | item 30935282 (no title) holdenk | 3 years ago Huh I had wondered why I saw so many Python packages blacklist MKL now I know why. discuss order hn newest dbcurtis|3 years ago The philosophy behind MKL is that each CPU vendor provides an MKL for their CPU. If you expect to mix and match MKLs and CPUs, you don’t understand the goals of MKL. ReleaseCandidat|3 years ago That would be 'each CPU vendor provides an optimized BLAS library for their CPU'. The problem is that Intel's MKL is more than just BLAS.But AMD does have its own optimized libraries:https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocl/ wyldfire|3 years ago Each CPU vendor or each CPU architecture? (genuinely asking, I don't know how it's intended) load replies (2) monocasa|3 years ago Are there any implementations of MKL other than Intel's? load replies (1)
dbcurtis|3 years ago The philosophy behind MKL is that each CPU vendor provides an MKL for their CPU. If you expect to mix and match MKLs and CPUs, you don’t understand the goals of MKL. ReleaseCandidat|3 years ago That would be 'each CPU vendor provides an optimized BLAS library for their CPU'. The problem is that Intel's MKL is more than just BLAS.But AMD does have its own optimized libraries:https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocl/ wyldfire|3 years ago Each CPU vendor or each CPU architecture? (genuinely asking, I don't know how it's intended) load replies (2) monocasa|3 years ago Are there any implementations of MKL other than Intel's? load replies (1)
ReleaseCandidat|3 years ago That would be 'each CPU vendor provides an optimized BLAS library for their CPU'. The problem is that Intel's MKL is more than just BLAS.But AMD does have its own optimized libraries:https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocl/
wyldfire|3 years ago Each CPU vendor or each CPU architecture? (genuinely asking, I don't know how it's intended) load replies (2)
dbcurtis|3 years ago
ReleaseCandidat|3 years ago
But AMD does have its own optimized libraries:
https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocl/
wyldfire|3 years ago
monocasa|3 years ago