top | item 31016431

(no title)

case0x | 3 years ago

Why would it ? On our end everything works fine. If you’re not one of the 400 companies, there's no difference

discuss

order

openknot|3 years ago

Yep. The vast majority of users don't follow these outages (aka don't browse forums like Hacker News or r/sysadmin), and thus aren't aware of them.

Many of these users are decision-makers who decide what tools to use, and will continue to use Atlassian out of inertia due to lots of existing documentation on the tool (this is compounded by not knowing about the outages, or not knowing the severity of the outages), and also because large, professional companies use their tools too.

I don't necessarily agree with the perspective to stay with it, but it uses a lot of political capital/innovation tokens/goodwill/etc. to change systems, when there are usually higher-priority things to do (than to get buy-in to switch).

dividedbyzero|3 years ago

Even those 400, especially Jira is crazy popular with a lot of scrum masters and the scrum crowd in general. I could see some of those 400 stick with Jira even after this shit show if only to avoid losing all their scrum masters.

foobiekr|3 years ago

Severe operational issues don’t give you pause?

asah|3 years ago

"first they came for ..."

gmfawcett|3 years ago

Poor taste, buddy. Comparing the Atlassian mess-up to the Holocaust diminishes the Holocaust.