top | item 31017860 (no title) levi-turner | 3 years ago Source for those curious about this: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1222646... discuss order hn newest outworlder|3 years ago It is interesting that the cryptocurrency in question is not named (simply referred to as "Cryptocurrency-1").Possibly because there are ongoing investigations about it? If this was bitcoin, they would likely state that. yakak|3 years ago It being eth would seem to match their narrative he was an expert. Maybe it was eth hence their narrative or maybe they redacted it for not being eth. gruez|3 years ago probably USDT?
outworlder|3 years ago It is interesting that the cryptocurrency in question is not named (simply referred to as "Cryptocurrency-1").Possibly because there are ongoing investigations about it? If this was bitcoin, they would likely state that. yakak|3 years ago It being eth would seem to match their narrative he was an expert. Maybe it was eth hence their narrative or maybe they redacted it for not being eth. gruez|3 years ago probably USDT?
yakak|3 years ago It being eth would seem to match their narrative he was an expert. Maybe it was eth hence their narrative or maybe they redacted it for not being eth.
outworlder|3 years ago
Possibly because there are ongoing investigations about it? If this was bitcoin, they would likely state that.
yakak|3 years ago
gruez|3 years ago