Hey HN - we’d really appreciate any feedback on this one as it’s still in R&D.
One of the bigger questions is with the class name approach. As written in the document, we replace the default class name when the developer provides a string.
Another strategy is to append the developers string to our own. This might be better if our styles are already close and you just want to make a tweak, but it could also be annoying to tear down our styles if you don’t want them (e.g. removing our box-shadow)
We’d also appreciate any examples of embeddable components that you particularly enjoyed working with.
colinclerk|3 years ago
One of the bigger questions is with the class name approach. As written in the document, we replace the default class name when the developer provides a string.
Another strategy is to append the developers string to our own. This might be better if our styles are already close and you just want to make a tweak, but it could also be annoying to tear down our styles if you don’t want them (e.g. removing our box-shadow)
We’d also appreciate any examples of embeddable components that you particularly enjoyed working with.
Thanks!